Lasemi Esshagh, Sezavar Mehdi, Habibi Leyla, Hemmat Seyfollah, Sarkarat Farzin, Nematollahi Zahra
Craniomaxillofacial Research Center, Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Islamic Azad University, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Private Practice,Tehran, Iran.
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Dec;15(4):201-205. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2015.15.4.201. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
This prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical study was conducted to compare the effects of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (A100) and 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (A200) on the vital signs and onset and duration of anesthesia in an inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB).
In the first appointment, an IANB was performed by injecting A100 or A200 in 1 side of the mouth (right or left) randomly in patients referred for extraction of both their first mandibular molars. In the second appointment, the protocol was repeated and the other anesthetic solution was injected in the side that had not received the block in the previous session. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) and pulse rate were measured during and 5 min after the injection. The onset and duration of anesthesia were also evaluated. Data were analyzed using t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test, and p-value was set at 0.05.
SBP and pulse rate changes were slightly more with A100; however, DBP changes were more with A200, although the differences were not significant (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the parameters evaluated in this study. The onset and duration of anesthesia, and the changes in SBP, DBP, and pulse rate during and 5 min after the injection were the same in both the groups.
For an IANB, A200 and A100 were equally efficient and successful in producing the block. Epinephrine concentration did not influence the effects of 4% articaine.
本前瞻性、随机、双盲临床研究旨在比较含1:100,000肾上腺素的4%阿替卡因(A100)和含1:200,000肾上腺素的4%阿替卡因(A200)在下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)中对生命体征、麻醉起效时间和持续时间的影响。
在首次就诊时,对于因拔除双侧第一下颌磨牙而前来就诊的患者,随机在其一侧口腔(右侧或左侧)注射A100或A200进行IANB。在第二次就诊时,重复该方案,并在上次未接受阻滞的一侧注射另一种麻醉溶液。在注射期间及注射后5分钟测量收缩压和舒张压(SBP和DBP)以及脉搏率。同时评估麻醉的起效时间和持续时间。使用t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验分析数据,p值设定为0.05。
A100组的SBP和脉搏率变化略大;然而,A200组的DBP变化更大,尽管差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究评估的各项参数均无统计学显著差异。两组的麻醉起效时间和持续时间,以及注射期间及注射后5分钟的SBP、DBP和脉搏率变化均相同。
对于IANB,A200和A100在产生阻滞方面同样有效且成功。肾上腺素浓度不影响4%阿替卡因的效果。