• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估发生压疮和与依赖相关损伤风险的Braden量表的预测效度。

Predictive validity of the Braden scale for assessing risk of developing pressure ulcers and dependence-related lesions.

作者信息

Roca-Biosca A, Rubio-Rico L, Fernández M I de Molina, Grau N García, Garijo G Tuset, Fernández F P García

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Universidad Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.

Hospital Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 2017 Sep 2;26(9):528-536. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.528.

DOI:10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.528
PMID:28880761
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 2014, a new theoretical model explained the mechanism of the development of pressure ulcers (PUs) and that of seven types of lesions known as dependence-related lesions (DRL). The aim of this study was to calculate the incidence of DRL that have been classified as PUs and to check the predictive validity of the Braden scale for assessing DRL in accordance with the new theoretical model in an intensive care unit (ICU). Method This longitudinal, prospective study was conducted in a Spanish ICU. The patients were monitored for 14 days in the ICU until they developed DRL, died, or were discharged. The patients' risk of developing DRL was assessed each day using the Braden scale. The following parameters were taken as reference for validating the scale: sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively), relative risk (RR) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Of the 295 patients included in the study, 27.5% developed DRL, which 50.6% were categorised as PUs, 17.3% caused by moisture, and 13.6% caused by friction. The rest were categorised as caused by a combination of factors. Risk according to the Braden scale was greater in the group of patients with DRL than in the group of patients without. The highest risk score provided the best predictive validity parameters for the DRL (Se 0.90, Sp 0.26, PPV 0.31, NPV 0.78 and RR 3.15 [confidence interval (CI) 95%: 1.42-6.96]). These vaules show the individuals at risk are well detected, although it is at the expense of generating a number of false positive cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The Braden scale has demonstrated a moderate capacity for predicting PUs and DRL caused by moisture, but no capacity for predicting DRL caused by friction.

摘要

目的

2014年,一种新的理论模型解释了压疮(PU)以及七种被称为依赖相关损伤(DRL)的损伤类型的发生机制。本研究的目的是计算已被归类为压疮的DRL的发生率,并根据新的理论模型,在重症监护病房(ICU)中检验Braden量表评估DRL的预测效度。方法:这项纵向、前瞻性研究在西班牙的一家ICU进行。对患者在ICU中进行14天的监测,直至其发生DRL、死亡或出院。每天使用Braden量表评估患者发生DRL的风险。采用以下参数来验证该量表:敏感度(Se)、特异度(Sp)、阳性和阴性预测值(分别为PPV和NPV)、相对风险(RR)以及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积。

结果

在纳入研究的295例患者中,27.5%发生了DRL,其中50.6%被归类为压疮,17.3%由潮湿引起,13.6%由摩擦引起。其余被归类为由多种因素共同导致。发生DRL的患者组根据Braden量表得出的风险高于未发生DRL的患者组。最高风险评分对DRL提供了最佳的预测效度参数(Se 0.90,Sp 0.26,PPV 0.31,NPV 0.78,RR 3.15 [95%置信区间(CI):1.42 - 6.96])。这些值表明,虽然以产生一些假阳性病例为代价,但有风险的个体能被很好地检测出来。

结论

Braden量表已证明对预测压疮和由潮湿引起的DRL有一定能力,但对预测由摩擦引起的DRL没有能力。

相似文献

1
Predictive validity of the Braden scale for assessing risk of developing pressure ulcers and dependence-related lesions.用于评估发生压疮和与依赖相关损伤风险的Braden量表的预测效度。
J Wound Care. 2017 Sep 2;26(9):528-536. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.9.528.
2
Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.压疮风险评估量表的有效性;库宾和杰克逊量表、布拉登量表及道格拉斯量表
Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Feb;41(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00135-4.
3
Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units.Braden 量表对重症监护病房患者的预测效度。
Am J Crit Care. 2013 Nov;22(6):514-20. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2013991.
4
Comparison of four pressure ulcer risk assessment tools in critically ill patients.比较四种危重症患者压疮风险评估工具。
Nurs Crit Care. 2021 Jan;26(1):48-54. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12511. Epub 2020 May 5.
5
Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.《Braden 量表对重症监护压疮风险预测的有效性:一项荟萃分析》。
Nurs Crit Care. 2020 May;25(3):165-170. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12500. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
6
Evaluating the validity of the Braden scale using longitudinal electronic medical records.使用纵向电子病历评估Braden量表的有效性。
Res Nurs Health. 2015 Apr;38(2):152-61. doi: 10.1002/nur.21642. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
7
[Incidence of dependence-related lesions in a population of critical patients].[危重症患者群体中与依赖相关病变的发生率]
Enferm Clin. 2016 Sep-Oct;26(5):307-11. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
8
Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.评估改良版Braden量表在急性护理环境中对骨科患者压疮风险预测的预测效度。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jun;18(11):1565-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02757.x.
9
Predictive validity and reliability of the Braden scale for risk assessment of pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.重症监护病房中用于压疮风险评估的Braden量表的预测效度和信度
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2018 Mar;42(2):82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.预测危重症患者压疮的挑战。一项多中心队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Oct;13(10):1775-1783. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-154OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk assessment instruments for pressure ulcer in adults in critical situation: a scoping review.成人危急情况下压疮风险评估工具:范围综述。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2023 Oct 6;31:e3983. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6659.3983. eCollection 2023.
2
Predictive validity of the braden scale for pressure injury risk assessment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Braden 量表评估成人压力性损伤风险的预测效度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurs Open. 2021 Sep;8(5):2194-2207. doi: 10.1002/nop2.792. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
3
Evaluation of ML-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool to Replace an Existing Tool in an Academic Health System: Lessons Learned.
评估基于机器学习的临床决策支持工具以取代学术医疗系统中现有工具:经验教训
J Pers Med. 2020 Aug 27;10(3):104. doi: 10.3390/jpm10030104.
4
Monitoring Immobilized Elderly Patients Using a Public Provider Online System for Pressure Ulcer Information and Registration (SIRUPP): Protocol for a Health Care Impact Study.使用公共医疗机构在线系统监测卧床老年患者的压疮信息及登记(SIRUPP):一项医疗保健影响研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Aug 12;8(8):e13701. doi: 10.2196/13701.