Chan Wai Shan, Pang Samantha Mei Che, Kwong Enid Wai Yung
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jun;18(11):1565-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02757.x.
To assess and compare the predictive validity of the modified Braden and Braden scales and to identify which of the modified Braden subscales are predictive in assessing pressure ulcer risk among orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
Although the Braden scale has better predictive validity, literature has suggested that it can be used in conjunction with other pressure ulcer risk calculators or that some other subscales be added. To increase the predictive power of the Braden scale, a modified Braden scale by adding body build for height and skin type and excluding nutrition was developed.
A prospective cohort study.
A total of 197 subjects in a 106-bed orthopaedic department of an acute care hospital in Hong Kong were assessed for their risk for pressure ulcer development by the modified Braden and Braden scales. Subsequently, daily skin assessment was performed to detect pressure ulcers. Cases were closed when pressure ulcers were detected.
Out of 197 subjects, 18 patients (9.1%) developed pressure ulcers. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the modified Braden scale was 0.736 and for the Braden scale was 0.648. The modified Braden cut-off score of 19 showed the best balance of sensitivity (89%) and specificity (62%). Sensory perception (Beta = -1.544, OR=0.214, p = 0.016), body build for height (Beta = -0.755, OR = 0.470, p = 0.030) and skin type (Beta = -1.527, OR = 0.217, p = 0.002) were significantly predictive of pressure ulcer development.
The modified Braden scale is more predictive of pressure ulcer development than the Braden scale.
The modified Braden scale can be adopted for predicting pressure ulcer development among orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting. Specific nursing interventions should be provided, with special attention paid to orthopaedic patients with impaired sensory perception, poor skin type and abnormal body build for height.
评估并比较改良版Braden量表和Braden量表的预测效度,确定在急性护理环境中,改良版Braden量表的哪些子量表对评估骨科患者压疮风险具有预测性。
尽管Braden量表具有较好的预测效度,但文献表明它可与其他压疮风险评估工具联合使用,或增加一些其他子量表。为提高Braden量表的预测能力,开发了一种改良版Braden量表,增加了身高体型和皮肤类型这两个因素,并剔除了营养因素。
前瞻性队列研究。
香港一家急性护理医院的骨科病房有106张床位,共197名患者,使用改良版Braden量表和Braden量表评估其发生压疮的风险。随后,每天进行皮肤评估以检测压疮。一旦检测到压疮,该病例即结束。
197名受试者中,18名患者(9.1%)发生了压疮。改良版Braden量表的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.736,Braden量表为0.648。改良版Braden量表的截断分数为19时,敏感性(89%)和特异性(62%)达到最佳平衡。感觉知觉(β=-1.544,OR=0.214,p=0.016)、身高体型(β=-0.755,OR=0.470,p=0.030)和皮肤类型(β=-1.527,OR=0.217,p=0.002)对压疮的发生具有显著预测性。
改良版Braden量表比Braden量表对压疮发生的预测性更强。
改良版Braden量表可用于预测急性护理环境中骨科患者压疮的发生。应提供具体的护理干预措施,特别关注感觉知觉受损、皮肤类型差和身高体型异常的骨科患者。