• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用LUCAS系统进行院外复苏后出现意外的附带影响。

Unexpected collateral impact after out of hospital resuscitation using LUCAS system.

作者信息

Shahinian Jasmin Hasmik, Quitt Jonas, Wiese Mark, Eckstein Friedrich, Reuthebuch Oliver

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep 7;12(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0643-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13019-017-0643-z
PMID:28882147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5588752/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanical chest compression using a piston device during reanimation is often the only way to ensure stable chest compression at a constant rate and force. However, its use can be associated with severe fractures of the thoracic rib cage and endanger the clinical course of the patient. Thus, the usage of such a piston device during the reanimation has currently been classified as a mere Class IIB indication.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of a 66-year-old male who underwent emergent CABG surgery after receiving out-of-hospital resuscitation as a result of myocardial infarction using the LUCAS system. Due to severe bilateral rib fractures a concomitant emergency chest-wall stabilization surgery had to be performed to ensure uncompromised graft flow to obtain stable cardiac function and hemodynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

Reanimation using LUCAS-System might enable stable resuscitation conditions. However, it is crucial not to underestimate potential collateral damage which can in turn aggravate patient's clinical condition.

摘要

背景

在复苏过程中使用活塞装置进行机械胸外按压通常是确保以恒定速率和力量进行稳定胸外按压的唯一方法。然而,其使用可能与胸廓严重骨折相关,并危及患者的临床病程。因此,目前在复苏过程中使用这种活塞装置仅被列为IIB类适应症。

病例报告

我们报告一例66岁男性病例,该患者因心肌梗死在院外接受复苏后使用LUCAS系统进行了急诊冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。由于双侧肋骨严重骨折,不得不进行急诊胸壁稳定手术,以确保移植物血流不受影响,从而获得稳定的心脏功能和血流动力学。

结论

使用LUCAS系统进行复苏可能会实现稳定的复苏条件。然而,至关重要的是不要低估潜在的附带损害,这反过来可能会加重患者的临床状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0d/5588752/915ea91cb6ca/13019_2017_643_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0d/5588752/d1fc98afec2e/13019_2017_643_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0d/5588752/b8f61b4bb224/13019_2017_643_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0d/5588752/fef518339a8f/13019_2017_643_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0d/5588752/915ea91cb6ca/13019_2017_643_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0d/5588752/d1fc98afec2e/13019_2017_643_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0d/5588752/b8f61b4bb224/13019_2017_643_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0d/5588752/fef518339a8f/13019_2017_643_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c0d/5588752/915ea91cb6ca/13019_2017_643_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Unexpected collateral impact after out of hospital resuscitation using LUCAS system.使用LUCAS系统进行院外复苏后出现意外的附带影响。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep 7;12(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0643-z.
2
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and after introduction of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS-2; a prospective, observational study.在引入机械胸外按压设备LUCAS-2前后院外心脏骤停患者的心肺复苏质量:一项前瞻性观察研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Apr 22;23:37. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0114-2.
3
Validating the LUCAS® mechanical chest compression fit specifications.验证LUCAS®机械胸外按压的适配规格。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;37(2):371-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.06.069. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
4
Full recovery after prolonged cardiac arrest and resuscitation with mechanical chest compression device during helicopter transportation and percutaneous coronary intervention.在直升机转运及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间,使用机械胸外按压装置进行长时间心脏骤停和复苏后实现完全康复。
J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;47(6):632-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.066. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
5
The LUCAS 2 chest compression device is not always efficient: an echographic confirmation.LUCAS 2胸外按压装置并非总是有效:一项超声检查确认。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;65(1):23-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.020. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
6
Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial.机械与手动胸外按压在院外心脏骤停中的应用(PARAMEDIC):一项实用的、整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):947-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61886-9. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
7
Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in cardiac arrest (PaRAMeDIC) trial protocol.院前机械压迫装置在心脏骤停患者中评估(PaRAMeDIC)试验方案。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010 Nov 5;18:58. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-18-58.
8
Emergency department use of a mechanical chest compression device frequently causes unanticipated interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.急诊科使用机械胸外按压装置经常会导致心肺复苏出现意外中断。
Resuscitation. 2018 Dec;133:e3-e4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
9
Effects of mechanical chest compression device with a load-distributing band on post-resuscitation injuries identified by post-mortem computed tomography.带有负载分配带的机械胸外按压装置对通过尸体计算机断层扫描确定的复苏后损伤的影响。
Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:226-31. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
10
Mechanical chest compression for out of hospital cardiac arrest: Systematic review and meta-analysis.院外心脏骤停的机械胸外按压:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Resuscitation. 2015 Sep;94:91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Extensive chest wall stabilization after cardiopulmonary resuscitation and urgent cardiac surgery.心肺复苏和紧急心脏手术后广泛胸壁稳定术。
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2023 Sep;20(3):205-209. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2023.131937. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
2
Mechanical CPR: Who? When? How?机械心肺复苏术:谁?何时?如何?
Crit Care. 2018 May 29;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2059-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation using electrically driven devices: a review.使用电动设备进行心肺复苏:综述
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Oct;7(10):E459-67. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.10.40.
2
Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第5部分:成人基础生命支持和心肺复苏质量:2015美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南更新
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S414-35. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259.
3
Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
院外心脏骤停的早期心肺复苏。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2307-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405796.
4
Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial.机械与手动胸外按压在院外心脏骤停中的应用(PARAMEDIC):一项实用的、整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):947-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61886-9. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
5
Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial.机械胸外按压与同步除颤对院外心脏骤停患者心肺复苏的影响:LINC 随机试验。
JAMA. 2014 Jan 1;311(1):53-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282538.
6
Evaluation of coronary blood flow velocity during cardiac arrest with circulation maintained through mechanical chest compressions in a porcine model.在机械胸外按压维持循环的猪模型中心搏骤停期间评估冠状动脉血流速度。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011 Dec 19;11:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-11-73.
7
Liver injury diagnosed on computed tomography after use of an automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation device.使用自动心肺复苏设备后经计算机断层扫描诊断出的肝损伤。
Emerg Radiol. 2011 Oct;18(5):429-31. doi: 10.1007/s10140-011-0949-4. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
8
Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs.手动心肺复苏与机械心肺复苏。猪的实验研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010 Oct 28;10:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-10-53.
9
No difference in autopsy detected injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with mechanical compressions with the LUCAS device--a pilot study.与使用LUCAS设备进行机械按压相比,接受手动胸外按压治疗的心脏骤停患者在尸检中发现的损伤并无差异——一项初步研究。
Resuscitation. 2009 Oct;80(10):1104-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.06.010.