Suppr超能文献

全身溶栓与导管定向溶栓治疗急性肺栓塞的院内结局及再入院率比较(来自国家再入院数据库)

Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes and Readmission Rates in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Between Systemic and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (from the National Readmission Database).

作者信息

Arora Shilpkumar, Panaich Sidakpal S, Ainani Nitesh, Kumar Varun, Patel Nileshkumar J, Tripathi Byomesh, Shah Purav, Patel Nirali, Lahewala Sopan, Deshmukh Abhishek, Badheka Apurva, Grines Cindy

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Mt. Sinai St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, New York.

Department of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1653-1661. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.066. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

Abstract

There are sparse comparative data on in-hospital outcomes and readmission rates in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) who receive systemic thrombolytics versus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). The study cohort was derived from the National Readmission Database 2013 to 2014, subset of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Systemic and CDT were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The co-primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmissions and secondary outcome was combined in-hospital mortality + gastrointestinal bleed + intracranial hemorrhage. We used propensity score match analysis without replacement using Greedy's algorithm to adjust for possible confounders. We identified a total of 4,426 patients (3,107: systemic thrombolysis and 1,319: CDT) with acute PE who were treated with thrombolysis. In our 2:1 propensity score algorithm, in-hospital mortality was lower in the CDT group (6.12%) versus systemic thrombolytics (14.94%) (odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.49, p <0.001). There was also a lower composite secondary outcome (in-hospital mortality + gastrointestinal bleed + intracranial hemorrhage) in patients who received CDT (8.42%) versus those who received systemic thrombolytics (18.13%) (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.53, p <0.001). Thirty-day readmission was lower in patients with CDT group (7.65%) compared with systemic thrombolytics (10.58%, p = 0.009). In conclusion, in-hospital mortality, as well as bleeding during primary admission was significantly lower with CDT compared with systemic thrombolytics for patients with acute PE. There was also significant decrease in rate of readmissions among patients receiving CDT compared with systemic thrombolytics.

摘要

对于接受全身溶栓治疗与导管定向溶栓(CDT)的急性肺栓塞(PE)患者,关于院内结局和再入院率的比较数据较少。该研究队列来自2013年至2014年的国家再入院数据库,是由医疗保健研究与质量局赞助的医疗保健成本和利用项目的子集。使用适当的国际疾病分类第九版临床修订版代码识别全身溶栓和CDT。共同主要结局是院内死亡率和30天再入院率,次要结局是院内死亡率+胃肠道出血+颅内出血的综合情况。我们使用倾向评分匹配分析,采用贪婪算法进行无放回抽样,以调整可能的混杂因素。我们共识别出4426例接受溶栓治疗的急性PE患者(3107例:全身溶栓,1319例:CDT)。在我们的2:1倾向评分算法中,CDT组的院内死亡率(6.12%)低于全身溶栓组(14.94%)(比值比0.37,95%置信区间0.28至0.49,p<0.001)。接受CDT的患者(8.42%)的综合次要结局(院内死亡率+胃肠道出血+颅内出血)也低于接受全身溶栓的患者(18.13%)(比值比0.41,95%置信区间0.33至0.53,p<0.001)。CDT组患者的30天再入院率(7.65%)低于全身溶栓组(10.58%,p=0.009)。总之,对于急性PE患者,与全身溶栓相比,CDT的院内死亡率以及初次住院期间的出血情况显著更低。与全身溶栓相比,接受CDT的患者再入院率也显著降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验