Holliday Emma B, Bonner James A, Formenti Silvia C, Hahn Stephen M, Kalnicki Shalom, Liu Fei-Fei, Movsas Benjamin, Fuller Clifton D, Thomas Charles R
Emma B. Holliday, MD, assistant professor, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; James A. Bonner, MD, chair, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham; Silvia C. Formenti, MD, chair, Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York; Stephen M. Hahn, MD, chair, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Shalom Kalnicki, MD, chair, Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Fei-Fei Liu, MD, chair, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Benjamin Movsas, MD, chair, Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Clifton D. Fuller, MD, PhD, associate professor, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and Charles R. Thomas, Jr., MD, chair, Department of Radiation Medicine, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
J Healthc Manag. 2017 Sep/Oct;62(5):302-313. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-16-00001.
The importance of emotional intelligence (EI) in physicians has attracted attention as researchers begin to focus on the relationship of EI to retention, promotion, and productivity among academic physicians. However, to date, no formal evaluation of EI has been conducted among current department chairs. The objectives of this study were to assess the EI of current chairs of academic radiation oncology departments and to correlate EI with a self-reported assessment of burnout.The authors invited 95 chairs of academic radiation oncology departments to participate in a survey, approved by an institutional review board, consisting of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire Short Form (TEIQue-SF) and the abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory (a-MBI). TEIQue-SF scores were evaluated for correlation with respondents' demographics and self-reported burnout scores on the a-MBI. Sixty chairs responded to the survey, for a response rate of 63.2%. The median (interquartile range) TEIQue-SF for the responding cohort was 172 (155-182) out of a maximum possible score of 210. The a-MBI emotional exhaustion and depersonalization subscores were low, with median (interquartile range) scores of 4 (2.25-6.75) and 1 (0-2.75) out of maximum possible scores of 18 and 30, respectively. Higher TEIQue-SF global scores were weakly correlated with decreased burnout. The study results show that academic radiation oncology chairs had a high EI and low rates of self-reported burnout. EI may be of increasing importance with respect to recruitment and retention of academic medical leaders.
随着研究人员开始关注情商（EI）与学术医生的留任、晋升和工作效率之间的关系，情商在医生中的重要性已引起关注。然而，迄今为止，尚未对现任系主任进行情商的正式评估。本研究的目的是评估现任放射肿瘤学学术部门主任的情商，并将情商与自我报告的职业倦怠评估相关联。作者邀请了95位放射肿瘤学学术部门主任参与一项经机构审查委员会批准的调查，该调查包括特质情商问卷简表（TEIQue-SF）和简化版马氏职业倦怠量表（a-MBI）。评估TEIQue-SF得分与受访者的人口统计学特征以及a-MBI上自我报告的职业倦怠得分之间的相关性。60位主任回复了调查，回复率为63.2%。在可能的最高得分210分中，回复队列的TEIQue-SF中位数（四分位间距）为172（155 - 182）。a-MBI的情感耗竭和去个性化子得分较低，在可能的最高得分18分和30分中，中位数（四分位间距）得分分别为4（2.25 - 6.75）和1（0 - 2.75）。较高的TEIQue-SF总体得分与较低的职业倦怠呈弱相关。研究结果表明，放射肿瘤学学术部门主任的情商较高，自我报告的职业倦怠率较低。在招聘和留住学术医学领导者方面，情商可能变得越来越重要。
Zotero 插件