Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Wisconsin-Madison, 667 WARF, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726, United States; Department of Public Health, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 390 HPER, 1914 Andy Holt Ave., Knoxville, TN 37996, United States.
Department of Public Health, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 390 HPER, 1914 Andy Holt Ave., Knoxville, TN 37996, United States.
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;191:19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.039. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
In the United States, there is concern that recent state laws restricting undocumented immigrants' rights could threaten access to Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for citizen children of immigrant parents. Of particular concern are omnibus immigration laws, state laws that include multiple provisions increasing immigration enforcement and restricting rights for undocumented immigrants. These laws could limit Medicaid/CHIP access for citizen children in immigrant families by creating misinformation about their eligibility and fostering fear and mistrust of government among immigrant parents. This study uses nationally-representative data from the National Health Interview Survey (2005-2014; n = 70,187) and comparative interrupted time series methods to assess whether passage of state omnibus immigration laws reduced access to Medicaid/CHIP for US citizen Latino children. We found that law passage did not reduce enrollment for children with noncitizen parents and actually resulted in temporary increases in coverage among Latino children with at least one citizen parent. These findings are surprising in light of prior research. We offer potential explanations for this finding and conclude with a call for future research to be expanded in three ways: 1) examine whether policy effects vary for children of undocumented parents, compared to children whose noncitizen parents are legally present; 2) examine the joint effects of immigration-related policies at different levels, from the city or county to the state to the federal; and 3) draw on the large social movements and political mobilization literature that describes when and how Latinos and immigrants push back against restrictive immigration laws.
在美国,人们担心最近限制无证移民权利的州法律可能会威胁到移民父母的公民子女获得医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)的机会。特别令人关注的是综合性移民法,即那些包含多项增加移民执法力度和限制无证移民权利的州法律。这些法律可能会通过制造有关其资格的错误信息,并在移民父母中引起对政府的恐惧和不信任,从而限制移民家庭中公民子女获得医疗补助/CHIP 的机会。本研究使用全国代表性数据(来自国家健康访谈调查,2005-2014 年;n=70187)和比较中断时间序列方法来评估州综合性移民法的通过是否降低了美国拉丁裔公民儿童获得医疗补助/CHIP 的机会。我们发现,法律的通过并没有减少非公民父母子女的入学率,实际上导致至少有一位公民父母的拉丁裔儿童的覆盖率暂时增加。考虑到先前的研究,这一发现令人惊讶。我们为这一发现提供了潜在的解释,并得出结论,呼吁未来的研究在三个方面扩大规模:1)检查与有合法非公民父母的子女相比,无证父母子女的政策效果是否有所不同;2)检查不同层次的移民相关政策的共同影响,从城市、县到州再到联邦;3)借鉴描述拉丁裔和移民何时以及如何反对限制移民法律的大型社会运动和政治动员文献。