Suppr超能文献

制造药品;产生快感:对澳大利亚维多利亚州药用大麻政策和法律的批判性审视。

Making medicine; producing pleasure: A critical examination of medicinal cannabis policy and law in Victoria, Australia.

机构信息

Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Australia.

Faculty of Law, Monash University, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Nov;49:117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.020. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

Abstract

Several jurisdictions around the world have introduced policies and laws allowing for the legal use of cannabis for therapeutic purposes. However, there has been little critical discussion of how the object of 'medicinal cannabis' is enacted in policy and practice. Informed by Carol Bacchi's poststructuralist approach to policy analysis and the work of science and technology studies scholars, this paper seeks to problematise the object of 'medicinal cannabis' and examine how it is constituted through governing practices. In particular, we consider how the making of the object of 'medicinal cannabis' might constrain or enact discourses of pleasure. As a case example, we take the Victorian Law Reform Commission's review of law reform options to allow people in the Australian state of Victoria to be treated with medicinal cannabis. Through analysis of this case example, we find that although 'medicinal cannabis' is constituted as a thoroughly medical object, it is also constituted as unique. We argue that medicinal cannabis is enacted in part through the production of another object (so-called 'recreational cannabis') and the social and political meanings attached to both. Although both 'substances' are constituted as distinct, 'medicinal cannabis' relies on the 'absent presence' of 'recreational cannabis' to define and shape what it is. However, we find that contained within this rendering of 'medicinal cannabis' are complex enactments of health and wellbeing, which open up discourses of pleasure. 'Medicinal cannabis' appears to challenge the idea that the effects of 'medicine' cannot be understood in terms of pleasure. As such, the making of 'medicinal cannabis' as a medical object, and its invocation of broad notions of health and wellbeing, expand the ways in which drug effects can be acknowledged, including pleasurable and desirable effects, helping us to think differently about both medicine and other forms of drug use.

摘要

世界上有几个司法管辖区已经出台了政策和法律,允许将大麻用于治疗目的。然而,对于“药用大麻”这一对象在政策和实践中是如何被制定的,几乎没有进行过批判性的讨论。本文借鉴了卡罗尔·巴奇(Carol Bacchi)的后结构主义政策分析方法和科学技术研究学者的工作,旨在探讨“药用大麻”这一对象,并研究它是如何通过治理实践来构成的。特别是,我们考虑了“药用大麻”对象的制造如何限制或实施愉悦话语。作为一个案例,我们以维多利亚州法律改革委员会对法律改革选择的审查为例,允许澳大利亚维多利亚州的人们用药用大麻进行治疗。通过对这个案例的分析,我们发现,尽管“药用大麻”被构成为一个完全医学的对象,但它也被构成为独特的对象。我们认为,药用大麻的部分实施是通过生产另一种对象(所谓的“娱乐大麻”)及其所附加的社会和政治意义来实现的。尽管这两种“物质”都被构成为不同的物质,但“药用大麻”依赖于“娱乐大麻”的“缺席存在”来定义和塑造其自身。然而,我们发现,在这种对“药用大麻”的表述中,存在着健康和幸福感的复杂实施,这开辟了愉悦话语的可能性。“药用大麻”似乎挑战了这样一种观点,即“药物”的效果不能从愉悦的角度来理解。因此,将“药用大麻”作为一种医学对象来制定,并援引广泛的健康和幸福感概念,扩展了人们对药物效果的认知方式,包括愉悦和理想的效果,帮助我们以不同的方式思考医学和其他形式的药物使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验