Marques Dos Santos Carlos Henrique, Dourado Doroty Mesquita, Kato da Silva Baldomero Antonio, Dorsa Pontes Henrique Budib, de Azevedo Neto Euler, Serra da Cruz Vendas Giovanna, de Oliveira Chaves Ian, Cunha Miranda João Victor, Durães Gomes Oliva João Victor, Dias Letícia do Espirito Santo, Martins de Almeida Murillo Henrique, Sampaio Trícia Luna
Department of Medicine, Anhanguera-Uniderp University, Rua Nova Era, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Department of Medicine, Anhanguera-Uniderp University, Rua Nova Era, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;46:351-356. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.07.031. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
There is a need to find an effective treatment against reperfusion injury. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the capacity of the ischemic postconditioning and statin to prevent renal reperfusion injury.
An experimental study developed at Universidade Anhanguera-Uniderp.
A total of 41 Wistar rats were distributed into 5 groups: ischemia and reperfusion (I/R), ischemic postconditioning (IPC), postconditioning + statin (IPC + S), statin (S), and sham. In the sham group, the infrarenal abdominal aorta was dissected and isolated; all others were submitted to aortic clamping for 70 min (ischemia) and posterior removal of the clamp (reperfusion, 70 min). In the IPC and IPC + S groups, postconditioning was performed in ischemia and reperfusion phases by 4 cycles of reperfusion and ischemia lasting 30 sec each. In the IPC + S and S groups, preceding the surgical procedure, atorvastatin was administered 3.4 mg/day for 7 days by gavage. After the procedure, the left kidney was removed for histological study.
The mean renal lesion was 4 in the I/R group, 2.44 in the IPC group, 1.22 in the IPC + S group, 1.11 in the S group, and 1 in the sham group. The I/R group had a higher degree of tissue injury when compared to the others (P < 0.001) and the IPC + S and S groups improved protection against IPC alone (P < 0.05).
Ischemic postconditioning and atorvastatin can minimize renal remote reperfusion injury.
需要找到一种有效的抗再灌注损伤治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估缺血后处理和他汀类药物预防肾再灌注损伤的能力。
在安汉格拉大学 - 联合大学开展的一项实验研究。
总共41只Wistar大鼠被分为5组:缺血再灌注组(I/R)、缺血后处理组(IPC)、后处理+他汀组(IPC+S)、他汀组(S)和假手术组。在假手术组中,解剖并分离肾下腹主动脉;其他所有组均进行主动脉夹闭70分钟(缺血),然后移除夹子(再灌注,70分钟)。在IPC组和IPC+S组中,在缺血和再灌注阶段通过4个循环的再灌注和缺血进行后处理,每个循环持续30秒。在IPC+S组和S组中,在手术前,通过灌胃给予阿托伐他汀3.4毫克/天,持续7天。手术后,取出左肾进行组织学研究。
I/R组的平均肾损伤为4,IPC组为2.44,IPC+S组为1.22,S组为1.11,假手术组为1。与其他组相比,I/R组的组织损伤程度更高(P<0.001),IPC+S组和S组比单独的IPC组改善了保护作用(P<0.05)。
缺血后处理和阿托伐他汀可使肾远程再灌注损伤最小化。