Mahaki Mohammadreza, De Sá E Souza Gustavo Souto, Mimar Raghad, Vieira Marcus Fraga
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Bioengineering and Biomechanics Laboratory, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Gait Posture. 2017 Oct;58:380-385. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.039. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
This study aimed to compare the ground reaction forces (GRF) and lower limb muscles correlation and activation time delay between Forward (FW) and Backward (BW) walking. Twenty-four male students participated in this research. Electromyogram activities of gluteus medius, biceps femoris, medial gastrocnemius, soleus and anterior tibialis muscles along with GRFs were measured. Each participant performed two FW and two BW trials bare foot. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis was performed over anterior-posterior and vertical GRFs time series. The paired t-test was used in SPM analysis. Cross-correlation analysis compared similarity in shape and time delay of EMG pattern. SPM analysis of GRFs showed that these two walking modes have asymmetrical kinetic behavior during most parts of stance phase. Based on cross-correlation analysis, the shape of EMG activation profiles differed, where a phase shift in the muscle activation pattern of approximately 60% occurred. This shift may indicate different control mechanisms, at the spinal level, underpin FW and BW walking modalities.
本研究旨在比较向前行走(FW)和向后行走(BW)时的地面反作用力(GRF)、下肢肌肉相关性以及激活时间延迟。24名男学生参与了本研究。测量了臀中肌、股二头肌、腓肠肌内侧头、比目鱼肌和胫骨前肌的肌电图活动以及GRF。每位参与者赤脚进行两次FW和两次BW试验。对前后和垂直GRF时间序列进行了统计参数映射(SPM)分析。在SPM分析中使用了配对t检验。交叉相关分析比较了肌电图模式在形状和时间延迟方面的相似性。GRF的SPM分析表明,这两种行走模式在站立阶段的大部分时间具有不对称的动力学行为。基于交叉相关分析,肌电图激活曲线的形状不同,肌肉激活模式发生了约60%的相移。这种相移可能表明在脊髓水平上,支撑FW和BW行走方式的控制机制不同。