Benson Jeryl D, Szucs Kimberly A, DeIuliis Elizabeth D, Leri Ali
Occupational Therapy Dep., Duquesne University, 218 Health Sciences Bldg., 600 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA. Tel 412-396-1611, fax 412-396-4343.
J Allied Health. 2017 Fall;46(3):158-163.
To assess student learning in two intervention courses when using a student response system (SRS) in combination with content quizzes (CQ) as a teaching/ learning strategy.
A within-subject design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of SRS use in combination with CQ on initial learning and retention of course content across two health science graduate-level courses. Thirty-three graduate students were enrolled in each course, and 24 participated in the study. Course exam questions were divided between content covered with standard course instruction including CQ and content covered with CQ and the SRS (CQ-SRS). Performance on these exam questions was analyzed with a two-tailed t-test, and odds ratios were calculated.
Students performed significantly better 6 months later on CQ-SRS-based questions.
Findings of this study suggest that use of a SRS with CQ supports initial learning and enhances long-term retention of course content better than use of CQ alone.
评估在两门干预课程中使用学生应答系统(SRS)并结合内容测验(CQ)作为教学策略时学生的学习情况。
采用受试者内设计,以评估SRS与CQ结合使用对两门健康科学研究生水平课程中课程内容的初始学习和记忆的有效性。每门课程招收了33名研究生,其中24名参与了该研究。课程考试题目分为涵盖标准课程教学(包括CQ)的内容和涵盖CQ与SRS(CQ-SRS)的内容。使用双尾t检验分析这些考试题目的表现,并计算优势比。
6个月后,学生在基于CQ-SRS的题目上表现明显更好。
本研究结果表明,与单独使用CQ相比,SRS与CQ结合使用更有助于初始学习,并能更好地增强课程内容的长期记忆。