• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一份关于高等教育中使用互动反应系统的问卷。

Validation of a questionnaire on the use of Interactive Response System in Higher Education.

机构信息

University of Granada, Department of Didactics and School Organization, Melilla, ES, Spain.

University of Granada, Department of Didactics of Corporal Expression, Melilla, ES, Spain.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Jun 28;29:e3418. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3374.3418. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.3374.3418
PMID:34190934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8253358/
Abstract

OBJETIVO

this study aims to design and validate a questionnaire to measure the students' perception of the use of IRS as a technopedagogical resource in the classroom.

METHOD

a 24 items questionnaire (Interactive Response System for the Improvement of the Teaching-Learning Process) was designed ad hoc for this research and applied to 142 university students.

RESULTS

both the exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis yielded 3 dimensions: classroom environment, teaching-learning processes and learning assessment. The results obtained both in reliability (Cronbach's alpha= 0.955) and in the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (χ2/df=1.944, CFI=0.97; GFI=0.78; RMR=0.077; RMSEA=0.08) reveal highly satisfactory indices.

CONCLUSION

statistical analyses confirm that this instrument is a valid, reliable, and easy-to-apply tool for professors to evaluate the student perception of student-centred learning.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在设计并验证一份问卷,以衡量学生对 IRS(互动响应系统)作为课堂技术教学资源的看法。

方法

专门为本研究设计了一个包含 24 个项目的问卷(互动响应系统,用于改进教学-学习过程),并应用于 142 名大学生。

结果

探索性和验证性因子分析均得出 3 个维度:课堂环境、教学-学习过程和学习评估。在可靠性(克朗巴赫 α=0.955)和验证性因子分析(χ2/df=1.944,CFI=0.97;GFI=0.78;RMR=0.077;RMSEA=0.08)中获得的结果都非常令人满意。

结论

统计分析证实,该工具是一种有效、可靠且易于教授使用的工具,可用于评估以学生为中心的学习中学生的看法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e450/8253358/2facd54b9dfb/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3418-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e450/8253358/2facd54b9dfb/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3418-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e450/8253358/2facd54b9dfb/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3418-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a questionnaire on the use of Interactive Response System in Higher Education.验证一份关于高等教育中使用互动反应系统的问卷。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Jun 28;29:e3418. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3374.3418. eCollection 2021.
2
Validation of the Polish version of the DREEM questionnaire - a confirmatory factor analysis.验证波兰语版 DREEM 问卷 - 验证性因子分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Aug 15;23(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04539-z.
3
Assessment of psychometric properties of the questionnaire on supervisor-doctoral student interaction (QSDI) in Iran.伊朗博士生导师互动问卷(QSDI)心理计量特性评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Oct 14;21(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02932-0.
4
Development of an instrument to measure medical students' perceptions of the assessment environment: initial validation.一种用于测量医学生对评估环境认知的工具的开发:初步验证
Med Educ Online. 2015 Oct 27;20:28612. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28612. eCollection 2015.
5
Reliability and validity study of the Thai adaptation of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (CBI-SS) among preclinical medical students at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand.泰国玛希隆大学诗里拉吉医院医学院预科医学生使用哥本哈根倦怠量表学生调查(CBI-SS)的泰语适应性可靠性和有效性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 30;16(12):e0261887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261887. eCollection 2021.
6
[Validation of the French version of the Body Shape Questionnaire].[《身体形态问卷》法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):162-73. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82383-8.
7
Using the design-thinking method to develop and validate a peer evaluation scale for team-based learning (PES-TBL) for nursing students.运用设计思维方法开发并验证了一个适用于护理专业学生的团队学习同伴评估量表(PES-TBL)。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Aug;127:105849. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105849. Epub 2023 May 25.
8
Translation, Adaptation and Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Mental Health Knowledge Questionnaire in a Sample of Higher Education Students in Portugal.翻译、改编和评估心理健康知识问卷在葡萄牙高等教育学生样本中的心理计量学特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043022.
9
Validating the ChatGPT Usage Scale: psychometric properties and factor structures among postgraduate students.验证 ChatGPT 使用量表:研究生群体的心理测量学特性和因子结构。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 24;12(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01983-4.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of motivation for nursing student scale (MNSS): A quantitative and cross-sectional design.护理学生动机量表中文版的心理计量学评估:一项定量和横断面设计研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Aug;71:103690. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103690. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Adapting Novel Augmented Reality Devices for Patient Simulations in Medical Education.在医学教育中采用新型增强现实设备进行患者模拟
Cureus. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66209. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66209. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of the implementation of audience response systems and their impact on participation and engagement in the education of healthcare professionals.对观众反应系统的实施及其对医疗专业人员教育中参与度和互动影响的系统评价。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Mar 23;4(2):47-50. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000245. eCollection 2018.
2
Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training.一份旨在衡量护生对实践培训满意度的问卷的效度验证。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Dec 5;27:e3206. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3102.3206. eCollection 2019.
3
Impact of educational games on academic outcomes of students in the Degree in Nursing.
教育游戏对护理学位学生学习成果的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 29;14(7):e0220388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220388. eCollection 2019.
4
Using Kahoot! as a formative assessment tool in medical education: a phenomenological study.将 Kahoot! 用作医学教育中的形成性评估工具:一项现象学研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1658-z.
5
Effects of interactive teaching on university students' knowledge and attitude toward reproductive health: a pilot study in Jordan.互动式教学对大学生生殖健康知识及态度的影响:约旦的一项试点研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Apr 23;11:211-221. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S160135. eCollection 2018.
6
Effects of competitive learning tools on medical students: A case study.竞争学习工具对医学生的影响:案例研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 8;13(3):e0194096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194096. eCollection 2018.
7
Millennial's perspective of clicker technology in a nursing classroom: A Mixed methods research study.千禧一代对护理课堂中点击器技术的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
8
Effects of different methods of reflection on nurses' gaze and judgement in a task using a touch panel.不同的反思方法对使用触摸面板完成任务时护士的目光和判断的影响。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):e569-e577. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14096. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
9
Impact of Student Response Systems on Initial Learning and Retention of Course Content in Health Sciences Students.学生应答系统对健康科学专业学生课程内容初始学习和记忆的影响。
J Allied Health. 2017 Fall;46(3):158-163.
10
The use of a game-based learning platform to engage nursing students: A descriptive, qualitative study.使用基于游戏的学习平台吸引护理专业学生:一项描述性定性研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 Nov;27:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Aug 30.