Lisbona A
Département de physique médicale, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest René-Gauducheau, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France.
Cancer Radiother. 2017 Oct;21(6-7):560-562. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.07.024. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
The cooperation between radiation oncologist and medical physicist is essential to guarantee the quality and safety of the irradiation of our patients. It would be wrong to consider that the intervention of medical physicists in the patient management process is limited to the provision of calibrated and controlled equipment and to guarantee the validity of the dose distribution and the treatment time, while the radiation oncologist has the complete control of all clinical activities related to irradiation. The intervention of physicists at the stage of acquisition of anatomical data and throughout the phase of optimization of the treatment is already a reality. The recognition of the profession of medical physicist as a health profession comes to legitimize this intervention. Should physician-physicist cooperation be limited to these common tasks and participation in continuing care? Can we envisage a true synergy of action that goes beyond the field of care? The answer to the question: what does the physicist expect from the radiation oncologist and vice versa may bring elements to reinforce tomorrow's cooperation. This article is the second part of the question.
放射肿瘤学家与医学物理学家之间的合作对于确保我们患者放疗的质量和安全至关重要。认为医学物理学家在患者管理过程中的干预仅限于提供校准和受控设备以及保证剂量分布和治疗时间的有效性，而放射肿瘤学家完全控制与放疗相关的所有临床活动，这种想法是错误的。物理学家在获取解剖数据阶段以及整个治疗优化阶段的干预已经成为现实。将医学物理学家职业认定为健康职业使这种干预合法化。医生与物理学家的合作应仅限于这些共同任务以及参与持续护理吗？我们能否设想一种超越护理领域的真正行动协同效应？对于“物理学家期望从放射肿瘤学家那里得到什么，反之亦然”这个问题的答案可能会为加强未来的合作带来一些因素。本文是该问题的第二部分。
