• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Performing all major surgical procedures robotically will prolong wait times for surgery.采用机器人进行所有主要外科手术将延长手术等待时间。
Robot Surg. 2017;4:87-91. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S135713. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
2
Adoption of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomies: A Population-Based Analysis of U.S. Surgeons from 2004 to 2013.机器人辅助部分肾切除术的应用:基于2004年至2013年美国外科医生的人群分析。
J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):886-892. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0174. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
3
The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists.微创前列腺切除术对美国泌尿外科医生执业模式的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Jun;34(6):255.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
4
A comparison of case volumes among urologic surgeons identified on an industry-sponsored website to an all provider peer group.
Urol Oncol. 2014 Nov;32(8):1095-100. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
5
A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation.一种新型单孔泌尿外科机器人系统:初步临床研究。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1033-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.039. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
6
Transition from open to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: 7 years experience at Hackensack University Medical Center.从开放性根治性前列腺切除术到机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的转变:哈肯萨克大学医学中心7年的经验
J Robot Surg. 2007;1(2):155-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0023-0. Epub 2007 May 10.
7
The impact of resident involvement in minimally-invasive urologic oncology procedures.住院医师参与微创泌尿外科肿瘤手术的影响。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Sep;8(9-10):334-40. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2170.
8
A multi-institution, minimally invasive urological oncology fellowship: a critical assessment of the clinical training and academic benefits.一项多机构微创泌尿外科肿瘤学 fellowship:对临床培训和学术收益的批判性评估。
J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2619-23; discussion 2623. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.011.
9
Survey of minimally invasive general surgery fellows training in robotic surgery.接受机器人手术培训的微创普通外科住院医师调查。
J Robot Surg. 2013 Jun;7(2):131-6. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0355-2. Epub 2012 May 13.
10
Robotic radical prostatectomy in 93 cases: Outcomes of the first ERUS robotic urology curriculum trained surgeon in Turkey.93例机器人根治性前列腺切除术:土耳其首位接受欧洲泌尿外科学会机器人泌尿外科课程培训的外科医生的手术结果
Turk J Urol. 2019 Feb 4;45(3):183-188. doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.24444. Print 2019 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Human Factors Integration in Robotic Surgery.人因工程学在机器人手术中的整合。
Hum Factors. 2024 Mar;66(3):683-700. doi: 10.1177/00187208211068946. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
2
The Impact of New Surgical Techniques on Geographical Unwarranted Variation: The Case of Benign Hysterectomy.新手术技术对良性子宫切除术的地理不合理差异的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 22;18(13):6722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136722.
3
Nephrectomy Delay of More than 10 Weeks from Diagnosis Is Associated with Decreased Overall Survival in pT3 RCC.从诊断起肾切除延迟超过10周与pT3期肾细胞癌的总生存期降低相关。
J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2021 Jun 14;8(2):27-33. doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v8i2.125. eCollection 2021.
4
Safety of Prolonged Wait Time for Nephrectomy for Clinically Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.临床局限性肾细胞癌肾切除术延长等待时间的安全性
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 30;11:617383. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.617383. eCollection 2021.
5
Robotic Surgery: Research and Reviews is indexed in PubMed.《机器人手术:研究与综述》被收录于PubMed数据库。
Robot Surg. 2019 Mar 26;6:1-2. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S204381. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放式经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照 3 期研究的早期结果。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1057-1066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
2
Comparison of 1800 Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomies for Renal Tumors.1800例机器人辅助与开放性肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(13):4277-4283. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5411-0. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
3
Perioperative Outcomes, Health Care Costs, and Survival After Robotic-assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A National Comparative Effectiveness Study.机器人辅助与开放根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期结局、医疗保健成本和生存:一项全国性的比较有效性研究。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.028. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
4
Robotic versus Open Prostatectomy: End of the Controversy.机器人辅助前列腺切除术与开放性前列腺切除术:争议终结。
J Urol. 2016 Jul;196(1):9-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.047. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
5
Robotic surgery for posterior mediastinal pathology.后纵隔病变的机器人手术
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;5(1):62-4. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.08.03.
6
Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of an All-payer Discharge Database.机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术:全支付者出院数据库的当代分析。
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):837-845. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.044. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
Comparison of Perioperative and Early Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Population Based Cohort.在当代基于人群的队列中比较开放和机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的围手术期和早期肿瘤学结果。
J Urol. 2016 Jul;196(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.105. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
8
Transoral robotic resection of a large schwannoma in the retropharyngeal space.经口机器人手术切除咽后间隙大型神经鞘瘤
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 Apr;130(4):401-3. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000190. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
9
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: An update on functional and oncologic outcomes, techniques, and advancements in technology.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术:功能和肿瘤学结果、技术及技术进展的最新情况
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;112(7):746-52. doi: 10.1002/jso.24040. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
10
The Comparative Harms of Open and Robotic Prostatectomy in Population Based Samples.基于人群样本的开放性与机器人辅助前列腺切除术的相对危害
J Urol. 2016 Feb;195(2):321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.092. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

采用机器人进行所有主要外科手术将延长手术等待时间。

Performing all major surgical procedures robotically will prolong wait times for surgery.

作者信息

Shinder Brian M, Farber Nicholas J, Weiss Robert E, Jang Thomas L, Kim Isaac Y, Singer Eric A, Elsamra Sammy E

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Robot Surg. 2017;4:87-91. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S135713. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

DOI:10.2147/RSRR.S135713
PMID:28890901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5586216/
Abstract

This article aimed to assess the burden of scheduling major urologic oncology procedures if all cases were performed robotically and to determine whether this would increase the time a patient would have to wait for surgery. We retrospectively determined the number of prostatectomies, radical nephrectomies, partial nephrectomies, and cystectomies at a single institution for one calendar year. A hypothetical situation was then constructed where all procedures were performed robotically. Using the allotted number of days that each surgeon was able to schedule robotic procedures, we analyzed the amount of time it would take to schedule and complete all cases. Five fellowship-trained surgeons were included in the study and accounted for 317 surgical cases. Three of the surgeons had dedicated robotic surgery (RS) time (block time), while two surgeons scheduled when there was non-dedicated RS time (open time) available. If all cases were performed robotically an additional 32 days would be needed, which could significantly increase the wait time to surgery. The limited number of robotic systems available in most hospitals creates a bottleneck effect; whereby increasing the number of cases would considerably lengthen the waiting time patients have for surgery. As RS becomes increasingly more commonplace in urology and other surgical fields, this could create a significant problem for health care systems.

摘要

本文旨在评估如果所有病例都通过机器人手术进行,安排主要泌尿外科肿瘤手术的负担,并确定这是否会增加患者等待手术的时间。我们回顾性地确定了一家机构在一个日历年中前列腺切除术、根治性肾切除术、部分肾切除术和膀胱切除术的数量。然后构建了一种假设情况,即所有手术都通过机器人进行。利用每位外科医生能够安排机器人手术的指定天数,我们分析了安排和完成所有病例所需的时间。该研究纳入了五位经过专科培训的外科医生,他们共完成了317例手术。其中三位外科医生有专门的机器人手术(RS)时间(整块时间),而另外两位外科医生在有非专门的RS时间(空闲时间)时进行安排。如果所有病例都通过机器人进行,将需要额外的32天,这可能会显著增加手术等待时间。大多数医院可用的机器人系统数量有限会产生瓶颈效应;即增加病例数量会大幅延长患者的手术等待时间。随着机器人手术在泌尿外科和其他外科领域越来越普遍,这可能会给医疗系统带来重大问题。