Suppr超能文献

临床实践指南:成人颈部肿块的评估

Clinical Practice Guideline: Evaluation of the Neck Mass in Adults.

作者信息

Pynnonen Melissa A, Gillespie M Boyd, Roman Benjamin, Rosenfeld Richard M, Tunkel David E, Bontempo Laura, Brook Itzhak, Chick Davoren Ann, Colandrea Maria, Finestone Sandra A, Fowler Jason C, Griffith Christopher C, Henson Zeb, Levine Corinna, Mehta Vikas, Salama Andrew, Scharpf Joseph, Shatzkes Deborah R, Stern Wendy B, Youngerman Jay S, Corrigan Maureen D

机构信息

1 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

2 Universityy of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Sep;157(2_suppl):S1-S30. doi: 10.1177/0194599817722550.

Abstract

Objective Neck masses are common in adults, but often the underlying etiology is not easily identifiable. While infections cause most of the neck masses in children, most persistent neck masses in adults are neoplasms. Malignant neoplasms far exceed any other etiology of adult neck mass. Importantly, an asymptomatic neck mass may be the initial or only clinically apparent manifestation of head and neck cancer, such as squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), lymphoma, thyroid, or salivary gland cancer. Evidence suggests that a neck mass in the adult patient should be considered malignant until proven otherwise. Timely diagnosis of a neck mass due to metastatic HNSCC is paramount because delayed diagnosis directly affects tumor stage and worsens prognosis. Unfortunately, despite substantial advances in testing modalities over the last few decades, diagnostic delays are common. Currently, there is only 1 evidence-based clinical practice guideline to assist clinicians in evaluating an adult with a neck mass. Additionally, much of the available information is fragmented, disorganized, or focused on specific etiologies. In addition, although there is literature related to the diagnostic accuracy of individual tests, there is little guidance about rational sequencing of tests in the course of clinical care. This guideline strives to bring a coherent, evidence-based, multidisciplinary perspective to the evaluation of the neck mass with the intention to facilitate prompt diagnosis and enhance patient outcomes. Purpose The primary purpose of this guideline is to promote the efficient, effective, and accurate diagnostic workup of neck masses to ensure that adults with potentially malignant disease receive prompt diagnosis and intervention to optimize outcomes. Specific goals include reducing delays in diagnosis of HNSCC; promoting appropriate testing, including imaging, pathologic evaluation, and empiric medical therapies; reducing inappropriate testing; and promoting appropriate physical examination when cancer is suspected. The target patient for this guideline is anyone ≥18 years old with a neck mass. The target clinician for this guideline is anyone who may be the first clinician whom a patient with a neck mass encounters. This includes clinicians in primary care, dentistry, and emergency medicine, as well as pathologists and radiologists who have a role in diagnosing neck masses. This guideline does not apply to children. This guideline addresses the initial broad differential diagnosis of a neck mass in an adult. However, the intention is only to assist the clinician with a basic understanding of the broad array of possible entities. The intention is not to direct management of a neck mass known to originate from thyroid, salivary gland, mandibular, or dental pathology as management recommendations for these etiologies already exist. This guideline also does not address the subsequent management of specific pathologic entities, as treatment recommendations for benign and malignant neck masses can be found elsewhere. Instead, this guideline is restricted to addressing the appropriate work-up of an adult patient with a neck mass that may be malignant in order to expedite diagnosis and referral to a head and neck cancer specialist. The Guideline Development Group sought to craft a set of actionable statements relevant to diagnostic decisions made by a clinician in the workup of an adult patient with a neck mass. Furthermore, where possible, the Guideline Development Group incorporated evidence to promote high-quality and cost-effective care. Action Statements The development group made a strong recommendation that clinicians should order a neck computed tomography (or magnetic resonance imaging) with contrast for patients with a neck mass deemed at increased risk for malignancy. The development group made the following recommendations: (1) Clinicians should identify patients with a neck mass who are at increased risk for malignancy because the patient lacks a history of infectious etiology and the mass has been present for ≥2 weeks without significant fluctuation or the mass is of uncertain duration. (2) Clinicians should identify patients with a neck mass who are at increased risk for malignancy based on ≥1 of these physical examination characteristics: fixation to adjacent tissues, firm consistency, size >1.5 cm, or ulceration of overlying skin. (3) Clinicians should conduct an initial history and physical examination for patients with a neck mass to identify those with other suspicious findings that represent an increased risk for malignancy. (4) For patients with a neck mass who are not at increased risk for malignancy, clinicians or their designees should advise patients of criteria that would trigger the need for additional evaluation. Clinicians or their designees should also document a plan for follow-up to assess resolution or final diagnosis. (5) For patients with a neck mass who are deemed at increased risk for malignancy, clinicians or their designees should explain to the patient the significance of being at increased risk and explain any recommended diagnostic tests. (6) Clinicians should perform, or refer the patient to a clinician who can perform, a targeted physical examination (including visualizing the mucosa of the larynx, base of tongue, and pharynx) for patients with a neck mass deemed at increased risk for malignancy. (7) Clinicians should perform fine-needle aspiration (FNA) instead of open biopsy, or refer the patient to someone who can perform FNA, for patients with a neck mass deemed at increased risk for malignancy when the diagnosis of the neck mass remains uncertain. (8) For patients with a neck mass deemed at increased risk for malignancy, clinicians should continue evaluation of patients with a cystic neck mass, as determined by FNA or imaging studies, until a diagnosis is obtained and should not assume that the mass is benign. (9) Clinicians should obtain additional ancillary tests based on the patient's history and physical examination when a patient with a neck mass is deemed at increased risk for malignancy who does not have a diagnosis after FNA and imaging. (10) Clinicians should recommend evaluation of the upper aerodigestive tract under anesthesia, before open biopsy, for patients with a neck mass deemed at increased risk for malignancy and without a diagnosis or primary site identified with FNA, imaging, and/or ancillary tests. The development group recommended against clinicians routinely prescribing antibiotic therapy for patients with a neck mass unless there are signs and symptoms of bacterial infection.

摘要

目的

颈部肿块在成人中很常见,但往往难以轻易确定其潜在病因。虽然感染是儿童颈部肿块的主要原因,但成人中大多数持续性颈部肿块是肿瘤。恶性肿瘤远远超过成人颈部肿块的任何其他病因。重要的是,无症状的颈部肿块可能是头颈癌(如鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)、淋巴瘤、甲状腺癌或唾液腺癌)的初始或唯一临床明显表现。有证据表明,在未得到其他证明之前,成人患者的颈部肿块应被视为恶性。及时诊断转移性HNSCC引起的颈部肿块至关重要,因为诊断延迟会直接影响肿瘤分期并恶化预后。不幸的是,尽管在过去几十年中检测方式有了很大进展,但诊断延迟仍然很常见。目前,只有1项基于证据的临床实践指南可协助临床医生评估有颈部肿块的成人。此外,现有的许多信息零散、无序或集中在特定病因上。此外,虽然有关于个别检查诊断准确性的文献,但在临床护理过程中关于检查合理顺序的指导很少。本指南旨在为颈部肿块的评估带来连贯、基于证据的多学科视角,以促进及时诊断并改善患者预后。

目的

本指南的主要目的是促进对颈部肿块进行高效、有效和准确的诊断检查,以确保患有潜在恶性疾病的成人能得到及时诊断和干预,从而优化治疗结果。具体目标包括减少HNSCC诊断的延迟;促进适当的检查,包括影像学检查、病理评估和经验性药物治疗;减少不适当的检查;以及在怀疑癌症时促进适当的体格检查。本指南的目标患者是任何年龄≥18岁且有颈部肿块的人。本指南的目标临床医生是颈部肿块患者可能遇到的首位临床医生。这包括初级保健、牙科和急诊医学领域的临床医生,以及在颈部肿块诊断中发挥作用的病理学家和放射科医生。本指南不适用于儿童。本指南涉及成人颈部肿块的初始广泛鉴别诊断。然而,其目的仅在于帮助临床医生对广泛的可能病因有基本了解。其目的不是指导已知起源于甲状腺、唾液腺、下颌或牙科病理的颈部肿块的管理,因为针对这些病因的管理建议已经存在。本指南也不涉及特定病理实体的后续管理,因为良性和恶性颈部肿块的治疗建议可在其他地方找到。相反,本指南仅限于处理可能为恶性的成人颈部肿块患者的适当检查,以便加快诊断并转诊至头颈癌专科医生。指南制定小组力求制定一套与临床医生在对有颈部肿块的成人患者进行检查时所做诊断决策相关的可操作声明。此外,在可能的情况下,指南制定小组纳入了证据以促进高质量和具有成本效益的医疗。

行动声明

制定小组强烈建议临床医生应为被认为恶性风险增加的颈部肿块患者开具颈部增强计算机断层扫描(或磁共振成像)检查。制定小组提出以下建议:(1)临床医生应识别出颈部肿块患者中恶性风险增加的患者,这些患者缺乏感染病因病史,且肿块已存在≥2周且无明显波动,或肿块持续时间不确定。(2)临床医生应根据以下体格检查特征中的≥1项识别出颈部肿块患者中恶性风险增加的患者:与相邻组织固定、质地坚硬、大小>1.5 cm或覆盖皮肤溃疡。(3)临床医生应为颈部肿块患者进行初步病史和体格检查,以识别出有其他可疑发现且提示恶性风险增加的患者。(4)对于恶性风险未增加的颈部肿块患者,临床医生或其指定人员应告知患者触发进一步评估的标准。临床医生或其指定人员还应记录随访计划,以评估肿块是否消退或最终诊断。(5)对于被认为恶性风险增加的颈部肿块患者,临床医生或其指定人员应向患者解释恶性风险增加的意义,并解释任何推荐的诊断检查。(6)临床医生应为被认为恶性风险增加的颈部肿块患者进行有针对性的体格检查(包括观察喉、舌根和咽部的黏膜),或将患者转诊给能够进行此项检查的临床医生。(7)当颈部肿块的诊断仍不确定时,对于被认为恶性风险增加的颈部肿块患者,临床医生应进行细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNA)而非开放活检,或将患者转诊给能够进行FNA的人员。(8)对于被认为恶性风险增加的颈部肿块患者,临床医生应继续评估经FNA或影像学检查确定为囊性的颈部肿块患者,直至获得诊断,且不应假定肿块为良性。(9)当颈部肿块患者被认为恶性风险增加且经FNA和影像学检查后仍未确诊时,临床医生应根据患者的病史和体格检查进行额外的辅助检查。(10)对于被认为恶性风险增加且经FNA、影像学检查和/或辅助检查未确诊或未确定原发部位的颈部肿块患者,临床医生应在开放活检前建议在麻醉下对上呼吸道消化道进行评估。制定小组建议临床医生不要常规为颈部肿块患者开具抗生素治疗,除非有细菌感染的体征和症状。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验