因果形成指标测量理论笔记：对哈丁的回应。
Notes on measurement theory for causal-formative indicators: A reply to Hardin.
机构信息
Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina.
Faculty of Business, Economics & Statistics, Department of Business Administration, University of Vienna.
出版信息
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):605-608. doi: 10.1037/met0000149.
Abstract
The current article is a rejoinder to "A Call for Theory to Support the Use of Causal-Formative Indicators: A Commentary on Bollen and Diamantopoulos." Our article comments on the 6 research questions raised by Hardin (2017) in his constructive commentary on our original article (i.e., "In Defense of Causal-Formative Indicators: A Minority Report"). (PsycINFO Database Record
摘要
这篇文章是对“呼吁用因果形成指标支持理论的使用：对博伦和戴蒙塔波洛斯的评论”一文的回应。我们的文章评论了哈丁（2017）在对我们的原始文章（即“为因果形成指标辩护：少数派报告”）进行建设性评论时提出的 6 个研究问题。（PsycINFO 数据库记录）
相似文献
1
Notes on measurement theory for causal-formative indicators: A reply to Hardin.因果形成指标测量理论笔记：对哈丁的回应。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):605-608. doi: 10.1037/met0000149.
2
A call for theory to support the use of causal-formative indicators: A commentary on Bollen and Diamantopoulos (2017).呼吁理论支持因果形成指标的使用：对 Bollen 和 Diamantopoulos（2017）的评论。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):597-604. doi: 10.1037/met0000115.
3
In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report.捍卫因果形成指标：少数派报告。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):581-596. doi: 10.1037/met0000056. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
4
Three Cs in measurement models: causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates.测量模型中的三个 C：因果指标、综合指标和协变量。
Psychol Methods. 2011 Sep;16(3):265-84. doi: 10.1037/a0024448.
5
Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007).解释性混杂是由于规范错误，而非指标类型：对豪厄尔、布雷维克和威尔科克斯（2007年）的评论
Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):219-28; discussion 238-45. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.219.
6
Investigating weight constraint methods for causal-formative indicator modeling.探讨因果形成指标模型的体重约束方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):6485-6497. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02365-9. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
7
Reflections stimulated by the comments of Shadish (2010) and West and Thoemmes (2010).受到 Shadish（2010）和 West 与 Thoemmes（2010）评论的启发而产生的思考。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Mar;15(1):38-46. doi: 10.1037/a0018537.
8
A critical review of scoring options for clinical measurement tools.临床测量工具评分选项的批判性综述。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 28;8:612. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1561-6.
9
The Taboo Against Explicit Causal Inference in Nonexperimental Psychology.非实验心理学中对明确因果推论的禁忌。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;15(5):1243-1255. doi: 10.1177/1745691620921521. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
10
Campbell's and Rubin's perspectives on causal inference.坎贝尔和鲁宾的因果推断观点。
Psychol Methods. 2010 Mar;15(1):18-37. doi: 10.1037/a0015917.
引用本文的文献
1
The Effect of Noninvariance on the Estimation of the Mediated Effect in the Two-Wave Mediation Model.非不变性对两波中介模型中介效应估计的影响。
Struct Equ Modeling. 2022;29(6):908-919. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2022.2067164. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
2
Validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) adapted for the whole day repeated measures context.验证经改编后适用于全天重复测量情境的美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数（NASA-TLX）。
Ergonomics. 2022 Jul;65(7):960-975. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2021.2006317. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
Measuring leadership an assessment of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire.测量领导力：多因素领导问卷评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254329. eCollection 2021.
4
Fusion Validity: Theory-Based Scale Assessment via Causal Structural Equation Modeling.融合效度：通过因果结构方程模型进行基于理论的量表评估。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 4;10:1139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01139. eCollection 2019.
5
Methodological approaches to the analyses of elder abuse screening measures: Application of latent variable measurement modeling to the WC-RAPS.老年人虐待筛查措施分析的方法学途径：潜在变量测量模型在 WC-RAPS 中的应用。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2019 Jan-Feb;31(1):1-24. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2018.1523766. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
本文引用的文献
1
A call for theory to support the use of causal-formative indicators: A commentary on Bollen and Diamantopoulos (2017).呼吁理论支持因果形成指标的使用：对 Bollen 和 Diamantopoulos（2017）的评论。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):597-604. doi: 10.1037/met0000115.
2
In defense of causal-formative indicators: A minority report.捍卫因果形成指标：少数派报告。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):581-596. doi: 10.1037/met0000056. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
3
Interpretational Confounding or Confounded Interpretations of Causal Indicators?因果指标的解释性混杂还是混淆的解释？
Measurement ( Mahwah N J). 2014;12(4):125-140. doi: 10.1080/15366367.2014.968503.
4
On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures.关于构念与测量之间关系的本质和方向。
Psychol Methods. 2000 Jun;5(2):155-74. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.5.2.155.
5
A tetrad test for causal indicators.因果指标的四分体检验
Psychol Methods. 2000 Mar;5(1):3-22. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.5.1.3.
Zotero 插件