• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体康复结果计数器的因素验证与拉施分析。

Factor validation and Rasch analysis of the individual recovery outcomes counter.

作者信息

Dickens Geoffrey L, Rudd Bridey, Hallett Nutmeg, Ion Robin M, Hardie Scott M

机构信息

a Division of Mental Health Nursing and Counselling, School of Social and Health Sciences , Abertay University , Dundee , UK.

b Penumbra , Edinburgh , UK.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jan;41(1):74-85. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1375030. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2017.1375030
PMID:28893097
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The individual recovery outcomes counter is a 12-item personal recovery self-assessment tool for adults with mental health problems. Although widely used across Scotland, limited research into its psychometric properties has been conducted. We tested its' measurement properties to ascertain the suitability of the tool for continued use in its' present form.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Anonymised data from the assessments of 1743 adults using mental health services in Scotland were subject to tests based on principles of Rasch measurement theory, principal components analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

Rasch analysis revealed that the six-point response structure of the individual recovery outcomes counter (I.ROC) was problematic. Re-scoring on a four-point scale revealed well-ordered items that measure a single, recovery-related construct, and has acceptable fit statistics. Confirmatory factor analysis supported this. Scale items covered around 75% of the recovery continuum; those individuals least far along the continuum were least well addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified tool worked well for many, but not all, service users. The study suggests specific developments are required if the I.ROC is to maximise its' utility for service users and provide meaningful data for service providers. Implications for Rehabilitation Agencies and services working with people with mental health problems aim to help them with their recovery. The individual recovery outcomes counter has been developed and is used widely in Scotland to help service users track their progress to recovery. Using a large sample of routinely collected data we have demonstrated that a number of modifications are needed if the tool is to adequately measure recovery. This will involve consideration of the scoring system, item content and inclusion, and theoretical basis of the tool.

摘要

目的

个体康复结果计数器是一种针对有心理健康问题的成年人的12项个人康复自我评估工具。尽管在苏格兰广泛使用,但对其心理测量特性的研究有限。我们测试了其测量特性,以确定该工具以其当前形式继续使用的适用性。

材料与方法

对苏格兰1743名使用心理健康服务的成年人的评估数据进行匿名处理,基于拉施测量理论、主成分分析和验证性因素分析的原则进行测试。

结果

拉施分析表明,个体康复结果计数器(I.ROC)的六点反应结构存在问题。重新按四点量表评分显示,项目排列有序,测量单一的、与康复相关的结构,且具有可接受的拟合统计量。验证性因素分析支持这一点。量表项目涵盖了约75%的康复连续体;在连续体上进展最小的个体得到的关注最少。

结论

一种经过修改的工具对许多(但不是所有)服务使用者都有效。该研究表明,如果I.ROC要最大限度地发挥其对服务使用者的效用并为服务提供者提供有意义的数据,就需要进行具体改进。对康复机构和为有心理健康问题的人提供服务的机构的启示旨在帮助他们康复。个体康复结果计数器已开发出来并在苏格兰广泛使用,以帮助服务使用者跟踪他们的康复进展。通过使用大量常规收集的数据样本,我们证明如果该工具要充分测量康复情况,需要进行一些修改。这将涉及对评分系统、项目内容和纳入情况以及工具的理论基础的考虑。

相似文献

1
Factor validation and Rasch analysis of the individual recovery outcomes counter.个体康复结果计数器的因素验证与拉施分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jan;41(1):74-85. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1375030. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
2
Validation of the brief version of the Recovery Self-Assessment (RSA-B) using Rasch measurement theory.运用拉施测量理论对康复自我评估简版(RSA - B)进行验证。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015 Dec;38(4):349-58. doi: 10.1037/prj0000139. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
3
Personally meaningful recovery in people with psychological trauma: Initial validity and reliability of the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC). 心理创伤人群的个体有意义康复:个体康复结果计数器(I.ROC)的初步有效性和可靠性。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Jun;29(3):387-398. doi: 10.1111/inm.12671. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the hope, agency and opportunity (HAO); a brief measure of mental health recovery.希望、能动性和机会(HAO)心理计量学评估;心理健康康复的简要测量工具。
J Ment Health. 2017 Dec;26(6):562-568. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1385746. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
5
Establishing the HLS-Q12 short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: latent trait analyses applying Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.建立欧洲健康素养调查问卷的HLS-Q12简版:应用拉施模型和验证性因素分析的潜在特质分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3275-7.
6
Assessing recovery of people with serious mental illness: development of a new scale.评估严重精神疾病患者的康复情况:新量表的制定。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jan;63(1):48-53. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100109.
7
Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey.沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)的内部结构效度:一项使用苏格兰健康教育人口调查数据的拉施分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Feb 19;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-15.
8
Rasch analysis of the Italian Lower Extremity Functional Scale: insights on dimensionality and suggestions for an improved 15-item version.意大利下肢功能量表的拉施分析:维度洞察及改进的15项版本建议
Clin Rehabil. 2017 Apr;31(4):532-543. doi: 10.1177/0269215516647180. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
9
Further validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in the UK veterinary profession: Rasch analysis.进一步验证英国兽医行业的沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS):Rasch 分析。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Mar;22(2):379-91. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0144-4. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
10
Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Recovery Attitudes Questionnaire (RAQ) among mental health providers: a questionnaire survey.心理健康服务提供者中《康复态度问卷》(RAQ)日语版的心理测量学特性:一项问卷调查
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 16;16:32. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0740-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Construct Validity of the Measurement Tools PH42 and I.ROC12 to Measure Positive Health in a General Population.测量工具PH42和I.ROC12在一般人群中测量积极健康状况的结构效度。
Health Care Anal. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/s10728-025-00533-2.
2
Measuring Recovery Using the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter: A Cross-Sectional Multi-Center Study on Structural Validity in Dutch Mental Health Care.使用个体康复结果计数器测量康复情况:荷兰精神卫生保健领域结构效度的横断面多中心研究
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70093. doi: 10.1111/inm.70093.
3
Measuring recovery in participants with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder: validation of the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC).
测量精神分裂谱系障碍患者的康复情况:个体康复结果计数器(I.ROC)的验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 28;23(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04763-3.
4
The Effectiveness of Day Hospitals in the Personal Recovery of Mental Disorder Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic.日间医院在新冠疫情期间对精神障碍患者个人康复的有效性
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 31;11(3):413. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030413.
5
Mental Health Recovery Using the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC) in a Community Rehabilitation Team: A Service Evaluation.在社区康复团队中使用个体康复成果计数器(I.ROC)促进心理健康康复:一项服务评估
J Psychosoc Rehabil Ment Health. 2022 Nov 16:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s40737-022-00315-2.
6
Measuring personal recovery in a low-intensity community mental healthcare setting: validation of the Dutch version of the individual recovery outcomes counter (I.ROC).在低强度社区心理健康保健环境中测量个人康复情况:荷兰版个体康复结果计数器(I.ROC)的验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03697-6.
7
Factors influencing the implementation of mental health recovery into services: a systematic mixed studies review.影响将心理健康康复纳入服务的因素:系统混合研究综述。
Syst Rev. 2021 May 5;10(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01646-0.
8
Evaluation of psychometric properties of the activities of daily living scale of motor function used by caregivers using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析评估照顾者所使用的运动功能日常生活活动量表的心理测量特性。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2020 Feb;32(2):148-155. doi: 10.1589/jpts.32.148. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
9
Measuring Recovery in Deaf, Hard-of-Hearing, and Tinnitus Patients in a Mental Health Care Setting: Validation of the I.ROC.在精神卫生保健环境中测量聋人、听力障碍者和耳鸣患者的康复情况:I.ROC的验证
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 Apr 5;25(2):178-187. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz043.
10
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ADL-focused Occupation-based Neurobehavioural Evaluation (A-ONE J): Applying Rasch analysis methods.以日常生活活动为重点的基于职业的神经行为评估日语版(A-ONE J)的信度和效度:应用拉施分析方法
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2019 Jun;32(1):32-40. doi: 10.1177/1569186119825885. Epub 2019 Feb 5.