Finbråten Hanne Søberg, Wilde-Larsson Bodil, Nordström Gun, Pettersen Kjell Sverre, Trollvik Anne, Guttersrud Øystein
Department of Public Health and Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, PO Box 400, N-2418, Elverum, Norway.
Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Nursing science, Karlstad University, SE-65188, Karlstad, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3275-7.
The European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47) is widely used in assessing health literacy (HL). There has been some controversy whether the comprehensive HLS-EU-Q47 data, reflecting a conceptual model of four cognitive domains across three health domains (i.e. 12 subscales), fit unidimensional Rasch models. Still, the HLS-EU-Q47 raw score is commonly interpreted as a sufficient statistic. Combining Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis, we reduced the 47 item scale to a parsimonious 12 item scale that meets the assumptions and requirements of objective measurement while offering a clinically feasible HL screening tool. This paper aims at (1) evaluating the psychometric properties of the HLS-EU-Q47 and associated short versions in a large Norwegian sample, and (2) establishing a short version (HLS-Q12) with sufficient psychometric properties.
Using computer-assisted telephone interviews during November 2014, data were collected from 900 randomly sampled individuals aged 16 and over. The data were analysed using the partial credit parameterization of the unidimensional polytomous Rasch model (PRM) and the 'between-item' multidimensional PRM, and by using one-factorial and multi-factorial confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with categorical variables.
Using likelihood-ratio tests to compare data-model fit for nested models, we found that the observed HLS-EU-Q47 data were more likely under a 12-dimensional Rasch model than under a three- or a one-dimensional Rasch model. Several of the 12 theoretically defined subscales suffered from low reliability owing to few items. Excluding poorly discriminating items, items displaying differential item functioning and redundant items violating the assumption of local independency, a parsimonious 12-item HLS-Q12 scale is suggested. The HLS-Q12 displayed acceptable fit to the unidimensional Rasch model and achieved acceptable goodness-of-fit indexes using CFA.
Unlike the HLS-EU-Q47 data, the parsimonious 12-item version (HLS-Q12) meets the assumptions and the requirements of objective measurement while offering clinically feasible screening without applying advanced psychometric methods on site. To avoid invalid measures of HL using the HLS-EU-Q47, we suggest using the HLS-Q12. Valid measures are particularly important in studies aiming to explain the variance in the latent trait HL, and explore the relation between HL and health outcomes with the purpose of informing policy makers.
欧洲健康素养调查问卷(HLS-EU-Q47)被广泛用于评估健康素养(HL)。反映三个健康领域(即12个分量表)中四个认知领域概念模型的综合HLS-EU-Q47数据是否适合单维Rasch模型一直存在一些争议。尽管如此,HLS-EU-Q47原始分数通常被解释为一个充分统计量。结合Rasch建模和验证性因素分析,我们将47项量表简化为一个简洁的12项量表,该量表满足客观测量的假设和要求,同时提供一种临床可行的健康素养筛查工具。本文旨在(1)在一个大型挪威样本中评估HLS-EU-Q47及其相关简短版本的心理测量特性,以及(2)建立一个具有足够心理测量特性的简短版本(HLS-Q12)。
2014年11月采用计算机辅助电话访谈,从900名年龄在16岁及以上的随机抽样个体中收集数据。使用单维多分类Rasch模型(PRM)的部分计分参数化和“项目间”多维PRM,以及对分类变量进行单因素和多因素验证性因素分析(CFA)对数据进行分析。
使用似然比检验比较嵌套模型的数据-模型拟合度,我们发现观察到的HLS-EU-Q47数据在12维Rasch模型下比在三维或一维Rasch模型下更有可能出现。12个理论定义的分量表中有几个由于项目较少而可靠性较低。排除区分度差的项目、显示项目功能差异的项目以及违反局部独立性假设的冗余项目,建议采用一个简洁的12项HLS-Q12量表。HLS-Q12对单维Rasch模型显示出可接受的拟合度,并使用CFA获得了可接受的拟合优度指标。
与HLS-EU-Q47数据不同,简洁的12项版本(HLS-Q12)满足客观测量的假设和要求,同时提供临床可行的筛查,而无需在现场应用先进的心理测量方法。为避免使用HLS-EU-Q47对健康素养进行无效测量,我们建议使用HLS-Q12。有效的测量在旨在解释潜在特质健康素养的方差,并探索健康素养与健康结果之间的关系以告知政策制定者的研究中尤为重要。