From the Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (T.B.O., J.V.S., M.K.B., M.P.); Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (S.R.); Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (J.K.K.V.-N.); Department of Internal Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Denmark (M.P., M.H.O.); and Centre for Individualized Medicine in Arterial Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Denmark (M.P., M.H.O.).
Hypertension. 2017 Nov;70(5):1034-1041. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09173. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
Markers of target-organ damage and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurement improve cardiovascular risk stratification. The prevalence of target-organ damage and raised BP increases with aging. The study aim was to evaluate the impact of age and target-organ damage on the prognostic value of ambulatory BP. Markers of target-organ damage and ambulatory BP were measured in 1408 healthy people aged 41 or 51 (middle-aged group), and 61 or 71 (older group) years. The primary outcome was cardiovascular events after 16 years of follow-up, with data obtained from national registries. The prognostic value of BP was evaluated with Cox regression models, adjusted for traditional risk factors and target-organ damage, including left ventricular mass, pulse wave velocity, carotid plaques, and urine albumin/creatinine ratio. A total of 323 events were observed. In comparison with traditional risk factors, adding systolic BP and presence of target-organ damage improved risk stratification by increasing concordance index from 0.711 to 0.728 (=0.01). In middle-aged subjects with target-organ damage, increment in pulse pressure (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.21; <0.01) and increment in average real variability (hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.59; =0.02) were associated with a greater risk of cardiovascular disease compared with subjects without target-organ damage: hazard ratio, 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.46; =0.81); for interaction, 0.02; and hazard ratio, 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.14; =0.36); for interaction, 0.01. Target-organ damage may be a marker of individual susceptibility to the harmful effects of pulse pressure and BP variability on the cardiovascular system in middle-aged individuals.
目标器官损伤标志物和 24 小时动态血压(BP)测量可改善心血管风险分层。目标器官损伤和血压升高的患病率随着年龄的增长而增加。本研究旨在评估年龄和目标器官损伤对动态血压预后价值的影响。在 1408 名年龄为 41 或 51 岁(中年组)和 61 或 71 岁(老年组)的健康人群中测量了目标器官损伤和动态血压的标志物。主要结局是 16 年随访后的心血管事件,数据来自国家登记处。使用 Cox 回归模型评估 BP 的预后价值,该模型调整了传统危险因素和目标器官损伤,包括左心室质量、脉搏波速度、颈动脉斑块和尿白蛋白/肌酐比值。共观察到 323 例事件。与传统危险因素相比,添加收缩压和存在目标器官损伤可通过将一致性指数从 0.711 提高到 0.728(=0.01)来改善风险分层。在中年有目标器官损伤的患者中,脉压升高(危险比,1.70;95%置信区间,1.31-2.21;<0.01)和平均真实变异性升高(危险比,1.29;95%置信区间,1.05-1.59;=0.02)与无目标器官损伤的患者相比,心血管疾病风险更高:危险比,1.04(95%置信区间,0.74-1.46;=0.81);交互检验,0.02;危险比,0.89(95%置信区间,0.69-1.14;=0.36);交互检验,0.01。目标器官损伤可能是个体对脉压和 BP 变异性对中年人心血管系统有害影响易感性的标志物。