• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征是生物可吸收血管支架植入的理想情况吗?

Are acute coronary syndromes an ideal scenario for bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation?

作者信息

Moscarella Elisabetta, Ielasi Alfonso, De Angelis Maria Carmen, di Uccio Fortunato Scotto, Cerrato Enrico, De Rosa Roberta, Campo Gianluca, Varricchio Attilio

机构信息

Laboratory of Invasive Cardiology, Santa Maria della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Napoli, Italy.

Division of Cardiology, ASST Bergamo Est, "Bolognini" Hospital, Seriate (BG), Italy.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2017 Aug;9(Suppl 9):S969-S978. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.136.

DOI:10.21037/jtd.2017.06.136
PMID:28894603
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5583090/
Abstract

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) represent the latest innovation in the field of interventional cardiology. BRS have recently been introduced in routine clinical practice and their use has progressively extended in everyday clinical practice. The BRS use appears theoretically attractive in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) as they are generally young with long life expectancy, thus possibly benefiting more of the so-called vascular reparative therapy. Furthermore, "culprit" lesions are usually softer and more easily expandable by current BRS compared to stable chronic lesions. However an increased risk of BRS thrombosis has been reported in clinical trials excluding ACS patients. Therefore, concerns have been raised on the safety of BRS implantation in the ACS setting in which the risk of thrombotic recurrences is definitely higher (compared to stable lesions) independently by the device implanted. Aim of this review is to provide an overview of the available data on the BRS performance in ACS patients.

摘要

生物可吸收血管支架(BRS)是介入心脏病学领域的最新创新成果。BRS最近已被引入常规临床实践,并且其应用在日常临床实践中逐渐得到扩展。BRS的应用在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中理论上似乎很有吸引力,因为这些患者通常较为年轻,预期寿命较长,因此可能从所谓的血管修复治疗中获益更多。此外,与稳定的慢性病变相比,当前的BRS通常更容易使“罪犯”病变变软并扩张。然而,在排除ACS患者的临床试验中,已报告BRS血栓形成风险增加。因此,对于在ACS环境中植入BRS的安全性存在担忧,在这种环境中,无论植入何种装置,血栓复发的风险肯定更高(与稳定病变相比)。本综述的目的是概述ACS患者中BRS性能的现有数据。

相似文献

1
Are acute coronary syndromes an ideal scenario for bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation?急性冠状动脉综合征是生物可吸收血管支架植入的理想情况吗?
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Aug;9(Suppl 9):S969-S978. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.136.
2
Early outcome of magnesium bioresorbable scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndrome-the initial report from the Magmaris-ACS registry.急性冠状动脉综合征中镁生物可吸收支架植入的早期结果- Magmaris-ACS 注册研究的初步报告。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):E287-E292. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28036. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
3
Sex Differences in the Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with Two Generations (Absorb and Magmaris) of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds.两代(Absorb和Magmaris)生物可吸收血管支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征和预后的性别差异
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 24;10(17):3768. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173768.
4
Impact of postdilatation on performance of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared with everolimus-eluting stents: A propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter "real-world" registry.与依维莫司洗脱支架相比,后扩张对急性冠状动脉综合征患者生物可吸收血管支架性能的影响:一项来自多中心“真实世界”注册研究的倾向评分匹配分析。
Cardiol J. 2016;23(4):374-83. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0052. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
5
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndromes: clinical evidence, tips and tricks.生物可吸收血管支架植入术治疗急性冠状动脉综合征:临床证据、技巧与窍门
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015;11(3):161-9. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2015.54006. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
6
Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes After Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗结局的荟萃分析比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;122(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
7
OCT-assessment of scaffold resorption: Analysis of strut intensity by a new resorption index for poly-l-lactic acid bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.OCT 评估支架吸收:一种新的聚 L-乳酸可吸收血管支架吸收指数分析支架强度。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec 1;94(7):928-935. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28223. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
8
Bioresorbable scaffolds in daily clinical routine: a practical review of all-comers results.日常临床实践中的生物可吸收支架:对所有患者结果的实用综述。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2015 Nov;30(6):650-6. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000229.
9
Major coronary evaginations following implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - Clinical and OCT characteristics.生物可吸收血管支架植入术后的主要冠状动脉突出——临床及光学相干断层扫描特征
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Jun;20(6):485-491. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
10
Impact of overlapping on 1-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implantation in routine clinical practice: Insights from the European multicenter GHOST-EU registry.在常规临床实践中接受依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架植入的患者中,重叠对1年临床结局的影响:来自欧洲多中心GHOST-EU注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;89(5):812-818. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26674. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Influences of Stent Design on In-Stent Restenosis and Major Cardiac Outcomes: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis.支架设计对支架内再狭窄和主要心脏结局的影响:一项范围综述和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2022 Feb;13(1):147-169. doi: 10.1007/s13239-021-00569-0. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
2
Mid-term outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds vs second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.生物可吸收血管支架与第二代药物洗脱支架治疗急性冠脉综合征患者的中期疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(10):e19458. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019458.

本文引用的文献

1
Thirty-Day Outcomes After Unrestricted Implantation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (from the Prospective RAI Registry).生物可吸收血管支架无限制植入术后30天的结果(来自前瞻性RAI注册研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 15;119(12):1924-1930. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
2
Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Stents in Routine PCI.生物可吸收支架与金属支架在常规 PCI 中的应用比较。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2319-2328. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614954. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
3
Twelve-month outcomes after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Data from the European Multicenter GHOST-EU Extended Registry.急性冠状动脉综合征患者生物可吸收血管支架植入 12 个月的结果。来自欧洲多中心 GHOST-EU 扩展登记处的数据。
EuroIntervention. 2017 Oct 13;13(9):e1104-e1111. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00568.
4
Predilation, sizing and post-dilation scoring in patients undergoing everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold implantation for prediction of cardiac adverse events: development and internal validation of the PSP score.在接受依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架植入术的患者中进行预扩张、尺寸测量和扩张后评分以预测心脏不良事件:PSP评分的开发与内部验证
EuroIntervention. 2017 Apr 20;12(17):2110-2117. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00974.
5
Everolimus- Versus Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease: A Matched Comparison.依维莫司与他克莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的对比:一项匹配对照研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 13;10(5):477-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.034. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
6
Does acute coronary syndrome impact on the incidence of thrombosis after the implantation of an Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold?急性冠状动脉综合征是否会影响 Absorb 生物可吸收血管支架植入后的血栓形成发生率?
EuroIntervention. 2017 Mar 20;12(16):2025-2027. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00472.
7
Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial.对比依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗冠状动脉狭窄的疗效(ABSORB II):3 年随机、对照、单盲、多中心临床试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2479-2491. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32050-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
8
A prospective evaluation of a standardized strategy for the use of a polymeric everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Rationale and design of the BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT study.一项关于在ST段抬高型心肌梗死中使用聚合物依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架的标准化策略的前瞻性评估:BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT研究的原理与设计
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 1;89(7):1129-1138. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26801. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
9
Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架植入术后的两年临床、血管造影及光学相干断层扫描连续随访:来自日本随机ABSORB试验的见解
EuroIntervention. 2016 Oct 20;12(9):1090-1101. doi: 10.4244/EIJY16M09_01.
10
Failure Mechanisms and Neoatherosclerosis Patterns in Very Late Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stent Thrombosis.极晚期药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架血栓形成的失败机制及新生动脉粥样硬化模式
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003785.