Smrke Alannah, Gross Peter L
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Aug 28;4:142. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00142. eCollection 2017.
Patients with cancer are at significantly higher risk of developing, and dying from, venous thromboembolism (VTE). The CLOT trial demonstrated superiority of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) over warfarin for recurrent VTE and established LMWH as the standard of care for cancer-associated VTE. However, with patients living longer with metastatic cancer, long-term injections are associated with significant cost and injection fatigue. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an attractive alternative for treatment of cancer-associated VTE. Meta-analysis of subgroup data of patients with cancer from the large DOAC VTE trials and small non-randomized studies have found no difference in VTE recurrence or major bleeding. With this limited evidence, clinicians may decide to switch their patients who require long-term anticoagulation from LMWH to a DOAC. This requires careful consideration of the interplay between the patient's cancer and treatment course, with their underlying comorbidities.
癌症患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)并死于该病的风险显著更高。CLOT试验表明,低分子量肝素(LMWH)在预防复发性VTE方面优于华法林,并确立了LMWH作为癌症相关VTE的护理标准。然而,随着转移性癌症患者生存期延长,长期注射LMWH会带来高昂的费用以及注射疲劳问题。直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)是治疗癌症相关VTE的一个有吸引力的替代选择。对大型DOAC VTE试验和小型非随机研究中的癌症患者亚组数据进行的荟萃分析发现,VTE复发或大出血方面并无差异。基于这一有限的证据,临床医生可能会决定将需要长期抗凝治疗的患者从LMWH转换为DOAC。这需要仔细考虑患者的癌症与治疗过程之间的相互作用,以及其潜在的合并症。