Suppr超能文献

使用自我报告的依从性问卷和药物监测设备进行依从性测量的一致性:更新综述。

Concordance of Adherence Measurement Using Self-Reported Adherence Questionnaires and Medication Monitoring Devices: An Updated Review.

机构信息

Department of Global Health Management and Policy, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jan;36(1):17-27. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0570-9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As medication adherence continues to be a prevalent issue in today's society, the methods used to monitor medication-taking behaviors are constantly being re-evaluated and compared in search of the 'gold standard' measure. Our review aimed to assess the current literature surrounding the correlation between self-reported questionnaires (SRQs) and electronic monitoring devices to determine if these measures produce similar results.

METHODS

We performed a literature search from 2009 to 2017 using PubMed, PubMed In-Process and Non-Indexed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid MEDLINE In-Process. A keyword search using the terms 'patient compliance', 'treatment compliance', 'medication adherence', 'drug monitoring', 'drug therapy', 'electronic', 'digital', 'computer', 'monitor', 'monitoring', 'drug', 'pharmaceutical preparations', 'compliance', and 'medications' was done to capture all articles. We included articles measuring adherence using both monitoring devices and SRQs.

RESULTS

Thirty-five articles were included in this review. The average difference in measured adherence rates between the two measures was 9.2% (range -66.3 to 61.5). A majority (62.7%) of articles reported moderate (n = 12; 27.9%), high (n = 5, 11.6%), or significant (n = 10, 23.3%) correlations between SRQs and monitoring devices.

CONCLUSION

Results from our review are consistent with previous studies, as we found that many of our studies produced moderate to high correlation between both SRQs and monitoring devices [Farmer, Clin Ther 21(6):1074-90 (1999), IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Avoidable costs in US health care (2012), Patel et al., Respirology 18(3):546-52 (2013), Siracusa et al., J Cyst Fibros 14(5):621-6 (2015), Smith et al., Int J Cardiol 145(1):122-3 (2010)]. Our findings demonstrate that self-reported adherence produces comparable results to electronic monitoring devices. As there is not yet a 'gold standard' measure for monitoring patient adherence, SRQs and Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) operating together continue to emerge as the preferred effective method for measuring medication adherence.

摘要

简介

由于药物依从性在当今社会仍然是一个普遍存在的问题,因此人们不断地重新评估和比较用于监测用药行为的方法,以期找到“金标准”的测量方法。我们的综述旨在评估目前关于自我报告问卷(SRQs)和电子监测设备之间相关性的文献,以确定这些测量方法是否产生相似的结果。

方法

我们使用 PubMed、PubMed In-Process 和 Non-Indexed、EMBASE、Ovid MEDLINE 和 Ovid MEDLINE In-Process 从 2009 年至 2017 年进行了文献检索。使用术语“患者依从性”、“治疗依从性”、“药物依从性”、“药物监测”、“药物治疗”、“电子”、“数字”、“计算机”、“监测”、“监测”、“药物”、“药物制剂”、“依从性”和“药物”进行关键字搜索,以捕获所有文章。我们纳入了使用监测设备和 SRQs 测量依从性的文章。

结果

本综述共纳入 35 篇文章。两种测量方法测量的依从率平均差异为 9.2%(范围-66.3 至 61.5)。大多数(62.7%)文章报告 SRQs 和监测设备之间存在中度(n=12;27.9%)、高度(n=5,11.6%)或显著(n=10,23.3%)相关性。

结论

我们的综述结果与之前的研究一致,因为我们发现我们的许多研究都表明 SRQs 和监测设备之间存在中度到高度的相关性[Farmer,Clin Ther 21(6):1074-90(1999 年),IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Avoidable costs in US health care(2012 年),Patel 等人,Respirology 18(3):546-52(2013 年),Siracusa 等人,J Cyst Fibros 14(5):621-6(2015 年),Smith 等人,Int J Cardiol 145(1):122-3(2010 年)]。我们的研究结果表明,自我报告的依从性产生的结果与电子监测设备相当。由于目前尚没有用于监测患者依从性的“金标准”测量方法,因此 SRQs 和 Medication Event Monitoring Systems(MEMS)共同使用继续成为测量药物依从性的有效首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验