• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤治疗机会(OPTION)问卷用于衡量医疗连续性的效度验证。

Validation of the OPportunity for Treatment In ONcology (OPTION) questionnaire measuring continuity of care.

作者信息

Rucci Paola, Foglino Silvia, Bravi Francesca, D'Avenia Rossella, Altini Mattia, Carradori Tiziano, Angelastro Angela, Fantini Maria Pia

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Azienda USL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Jan;27(1). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12765. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1111/ecc.12765
PMID:28895233
Abstract

Increasing efforts are ongoing to deliver effective cancer care through integrated networks of services. Measuring patients' experience of care is essential to identify problematic areas that require organisational adjustments. The aim of the present study was to examine the validity of OPTION questionnaire, designed to measure patient's perceived continuity of care across different phases of their care pathway. The study was carried at the Institute for Cancer Treatment and Research, Meldola and the oncology departments of the Local Health Authority of Romagna, Italy. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to identify factors underlying patients' perception of continuity of care. Factor scores were compared between patients with or without a care coordinator using Mann-Whitney test. The study sample consisted of 214 patients with breast or colorectal cancer, with a mean age of 62.3 years. Most patients identified the oncologist as their care coordinator. Five factors were extracted using PCA: (1) "trustful relationship with health care staff," (2) "information on care pathway," (3) "information on changes related to the illness," (4) "feelings of abandonment" and (5) "collaboration among health care professionals." The scores of factors 2 and 3 were significantly higher among those with a care coordinator. The OPTION questionnaire is a reliable instrument that can help clinicians and administrative stakeholder target efforts and resources in the pursuit of quality of care.

摘要

通过综合服务网络提供有效的癌症护理的努力正在不断加强。衡量患者的护理体验对于识别需要组织调整的问题领域至关重要。本研究的目的是检验OPTION问卷的有效性,该问卷旨在衡量患者在其护理路径不同阶段对护理连续性的感知。该研究在意大利梅尔多拉的癌症治疗与研究所以及罗马涅地方卫生局的肿瘤科进行。进行主成分分析(PCA)以确定患者护理连续性感知背后的因素。使用曼-惠特尼检验比较有或没有护理协调员的患者之间的因子得分。研究样本包括214例乳腺癌或结直肠癌患者,平均年龄62.3岁。大多数患者将肿瘤学家视为他们的护理协调员。使用PCA提取了五个因素:(1)“与医护人员的信任关系”,(2)“护理路径信息”,(3)“与疾病相关变化的信息”,(4)“被遗弃感”和(5)“医护人员之间的协作”。有护理协调员的患者中因素2和3的得分显著更高。OPTION问卷是一种可靠的工具,可以帮助临床医生和行政利益相关者在追求护理质量的过程中确定工作重点和资源分配方向。

相似文献

1
Validation of the OPportunity for Treatment In ONcology (OPTION) questionnaire measuring continuity of care.肿瘤治疗机会(OPTION)问卷用于衡量医疗连续性的效度验证。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Jan;27(1). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12765. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
2
[Continuity of care in oncology. Quantitative analysis of data from patients treated in two different settings in Emilia--Romagna.].[肿瘤学中的连续性护理。对艾米利亚-罗马涅地区两种不同治疗环境下患者数据的定量分析。]
Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Jun;108(6):288-293. doi: 10.1701/2715.27716.
3
Measuring patient-perceived continuity of care for patients with long-term conditions in primary care.衡量初级保健中慢性病患者所感知的连续性医疗服务。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Dec 5;15:191. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0191-8.
4
The relationship between continuity of care and trust with stage of cancer at diagnosis.诊断时的癌症分期与连续性护理和信任之间的关系。
Fam Med. 2004 Jan;36(1):35-9.
5
Reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire for measuring patients' perceived continuity of care in oral anticancer therapy.用于评估口腔抗癌治疗中患者感知到的护理连续性的尼美根连续性问卷希伯来语版本的信度和效度。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Nov;27(6):e12913. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12913. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Continuity of care of cancer patients. Analysis of theoretical models and survey tools of continuity of care in people with a cancer diagnosis.癌症患者的连续性护理。癌症诊断患者护理连续性的理论模型与调查工具分析。
Ann Ig. 2014 Jul-Aug;26(4):380-90.
7
The relationship between psychosocial factors in the patient-oncologist relationship and quality of care: A study of breast cancer patients.患者与肿瘤医生关系中的心理社会因素与医疗质量的关系:一项针对乳腺癌患者的研究。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2017 Jan-Feb;35(1):32-46. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1247406. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
8
Validation of 2 new measures of continuity of care based on year-to-year follow-up with known providers of health care.基于对已知医疗服务提供者的逐年随访,对两种新的医疗连续性测量方法进行验证。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):559-67. doi: 10.1370/afm.1692.
9
Perceived concepts of continuity of care in people with colorectal and breast cancer--a qualitative case study analysis.结直肠癌和乳腺癌患者对连续性护理的认知概念——一项定性案例研究分析
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Nov;17(6):569-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00891.x. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
10
Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire: development and testing of a questionnaire that measures continuity of care.尼姆斯延续性问卷:一种测量医疗照护延续性的问卷开发与测试
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1391-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Content validity of patient-reported measures evaluating experiences of the quality of transitions in healthcare settings-a scoping review.评估患者在医疗保健环境中经历的过渡质量的报告测量的内容效度:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11298-0.
2
Patient Experience Drivers of Overall Satisfaction With Care in Cancer Patients: Evidence From Responders to the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey.癌症患者对医疗总体满意度的患者体验驱动因素:来自英国癌症患者体验调查受访者的证据
J Patient Exp. 2020 Oct;7(5):758-765. doi: 10.1177/2374373519889435. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
3
Impact of health-related stigma on psychosocial functioning in cancer patients: Construct validity of the stigma-related social problems scale.
健康相关污名对癌症患者心理社会功能的影响:污名相关社会问题量表的构建效度。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020 Nov;29(6):e13312. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13312. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
4
Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives: A Case Study of the Lung Cancer Integrated Care Pathway.患者与医疗保健专业人员视角:肺癌综合护理路径的案例研究
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Oct 31;18(4):7. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3972.