Suppr超能文献

桥小脑角区微血管减压术后听力损失:系统评价。

Hearing Loss following Posterior Fossa Microvascular Decompression: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA.

2 Clinical Research Office-Division of Biostatistics, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jan;158(1):62-75. doi: 10.1177/0194599817728878. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

Abstract

Objectives (1) Determine the prevalence of hearing loss following microvascular decompression (MVD) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and hemifacial spasm (HFS). (2) Demonstrate factors that affect postoperative hearing outcomes after MVD. Data Sources PubMed-NCBI, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases from 1981 to 2016. Review Methods Systematic review of prospective cohort studies and retrospective reviews in which any type of hearing loss was recorded after MVD for TN or HFS. Three researchers extracted data regarding operative indications, procedures performed, and diagnostic tests employed. Discrepancies were resolved by mutual consensus. Results Sixty-nine references with 18,233 operations met inclusion criteria. There were 7093 patients treated for TN and 11,140 for HFS. The overall reported prevalence of hearing loss after MVD for TN and HFS was 5.58% and 8.25%, respectively. However, many of these studies relied on subjective measures of reporting hearing loss. In 23 studies with consistent perioperative audiograms, prevalence of hearing loss was 13.47% for TN and 13.39% for HFS, with no significant difference between indications ( P = .95). Studies using intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring were more likely to report hearing loss for TN (relative risk [RR], 2.28; P < .001) but not with HFS (RR, 0.88; P = .056). Conclusion Conductive and sensorineural hearing loss are important complications following posterior fossa MVD. Many studies have reported on hearing loss using either subjective measures and/or inconsistent audiometric testing. Routine perioperative audiogram protocols improve the detection of hearing loss and may more accurately represent the true risk of hearing loss after MVD for TN and HFS.

摘要

目的

(1)确定微血管减压术(MVD)治疗三叉神经痛(TN)和半面痉挛(HFS)后听力损失的发生率。(2)证明影响 MVD 后术后听力结果的因素。

数据来源

1981 年至 2016 年期间,PubMed-NCBI、Scopus、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 数据库。

审查方法

对前瞻性队列研究和回顾性研究进行系统评价,其中记录了 MVD 治疗 TN 或 HFS 后任何类型的听力损失。三位研究人员提取了有关手术适应证、手术操作和使用的诊断测试的数据。意见分歧通过共同协商解决。

结果

有 69 篇参考文献和 18233 例手术符合纳入标准。有 7093 例患者接受了 TN 治疗,11140 例患者接受了 HFS 治疗。MVD 治疗 TN 和 HFS 后听力损失的总体报告发生率分别为 5.58%和 8.25%。然而,许多这些研究都依赖于报告听力损失的主观测量。在 23 项具有一致围手术期听力图的研究中,TN 的听力损失发生率为 13.47%,HFS 的听力损失发生率为 13.39%,两种适应证之间无显著差异(P=0.95)。使用术中脑干听觉诱发电位监测的研究更有可能报告 TN 的听力损失(相对风险[RR],2.28;P<0.001),但 HFS 无此报告(RR,0.88;P=0.056)。

结论

传导性和感音神经性听力损失是后颅窝 MVD 的重要并发症。许多研究使用主观测量和/或不一致的听力测试报告听力损失。常规围手术期听力图方案可提高听力损失的检出率,并可能更准确地代表 TN 和 HFS 后 MVD 听力损失的真实风险。

相似文献

8
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Microvascular Decompression Surgery for Hemifacial Spasm.微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Jan;27(1):124-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002306.
3
Management of Bilateral Hemifacial Spasm with Microvascular Decompression.微血管减压术治疗双侧半面痉挛
World Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;87:640-5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.10.091. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
7
Hemifacial spasm: The past, present and future.面肌痉挛:过去、现在与未来。
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Sep 15;356(1-2):27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.06.032. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
8
Hemifacial spasm: 20-year surgical experience, lesson learned.面肌痉挛:20年手术经验及经验教训
Surg Neurol Int. 2015 May 20;6:83. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.157443. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验