Schneider Juliana, Zenger Markus, Brähler Elmar, Stöbel-Richter Yve, Berth Hendrik
Psychosoziale Medizin und Entwicklungsneurowissenschaften, Forschungsgruppe Angewandte Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden.
Fachbereich Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2018 Aug;68(8):361-368. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-113558. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
The measurement of subjective physical health is important in clinical settings as well as for research purposes. In the present paper, the psychometric properties of the G-Score, a 4 item screening questionnaire for the self-assessment of one's physical health, is explored.
The Objectivity, validity and reliability were estimated. Moreover, an item analysis and a suitable cut-off-value for the differentiation between healthy and presumably ill subjects were conducted. Data from the Saxony Longitudinal Study ("Sächsische Längsschnittstudie") 1998-2013 were analysed (N=324-417 healthy individuals).
The objectivity of the G-Score is estimated as very good. As a cut off for the differentiation between healthy and presumably ill subjects, a G-Score of 4 is suggested. The content validity is slightly lacking. Correlations with associated and non-associated constructs hint an interaction of physical with psychological discomfort. A good predictive validity of the instrument is assessed. Reliability estimates show acceptably good results. This indicates a high sensitivity for changes in the measured construct.
Putting all results into consideration, a use of the G-Score as a screening questionnaire in research is recommended. However, more psychometric investigations with representative samples and objective comparative data should be carried out.
主观身体健康的测量在临床环境以及研究目的中都很重要。在本文中,探讨了G评分(一种用于自我评估身体健康的4项筛查问卷)的心理测量特性。
评估了客观性、有效性和可靠性。此外,进行了项目分析,并确定了区分健康与疑似患病受试者的合适临界值。分析了1998 - 2013年萨克森纵向研究(“Sächsische Längsschnittstudie”)的数据(N = 324 - 417名健康个体)。
G评分的客观性评估为非常好。建议将G评分为4作为区分健康与疑似患病受试者的临界值。内容效度略有不足。与相关和不相关结构的相关性表明身体不适与心理不适之间存在相互作用。该工具的预测效度评估良好。可靠性估计显示出可接受的良好结果。这表明对所测量结构的变化具有高度敏感性。
综合所有结果,建议在研究中使用G评分作为筛查问卷。然而,应该进行更多使用代表性样本和客观比较数据的心理测量研究。