Dai Wen-Li, Zhou Ai-Guo, Zhang Hua, Zhang Jian
Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
J Knee Surg. 2018 Aug;31(7):654-663. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606376. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
The use of tranexamic acid (TXA) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is well documented. However, considering the potential side effects, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), the ideal route of administration remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of topical versus intravenous TXA and explore the most effective regimen in patients undergoing primary TKA. We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database through July 2016 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of topical and intravenous TXA in primary TKA. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. We assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE profiler software. A total of 15 RCTs including 1,240 participants met the inclusion criteria. We found no statistically significant difference between topical and intravenous TXA in terms of transfusion rate ( = 0.75), total blood loss ( = 0.51), total drain output ( = 0.60), maximum hemoglobin drop ( = 0.24), length of stay ( = 0.08), and thromboembolic complications ( = 0.73). Subgroup analyses showed that compared with 1 g topical TXA, 2 g topical TXA was more effective to reduce blood transfusion rate and total blood loss, and did not increase thromboembolic complications. We also found three times intravenous TXA was more effective than one time of intravenous TXA to reduce blood transfusion rate and total blood loss without increasing of thromboembolic complications. Topical TXA had a similar efficacy to intravenous TXA in reducing blood transfusion and blood loss, and did not increase the risk of thromboembolic complications in primary TKA. Besides, the current meta-analysis suggested that three times of intravenous TXA is efficient and safe. We also recommended 2 g topical TXA instead of 1 g topical TXA because it was more efficient to reduce blood transfusion rate and total blood loss and did not increase thromboembolic complications.
氨甲环酸(TXA)在初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的应用已有充分记录。然而,考虑到其潜在的副作用,包括深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE),理想的给药途径仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较局部应用与静脉注射TXA的疗效,并探索初次TKA患者中最有效的治疗方案。我们通过检索截至2016年7月的PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行系统的文献搜索,以识别评估局部和静脉注射TXA在初次TKA中疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们使用Cochrane协作网的工具评估偏倚风险。我们使用GRADE分析软件评估证据质量。共有15项RCT(包括1240名参与者)符合纳入标准。我们发现,在输血率(=0.75)、总失血量(=0.51)、总引流量(=0.60)、最大血红蛋白下降量(=0.24)、住院时间(=0.08)和血栓栓塞并发症(=0.73)方面,局部应用和静脉注射TXA之间无统计学显著差异。亚组分析表明,与1g局部应用TXA相比,2g局部应用TXA在降低输血率和总失血量方面更有效,且不会增加血栓栓塞并发症。我们还发现,三次静脉注射TXA在降低输血率和总失血量方面比一次静脉注射TXA更有效,且不会增加血栓栓塞并发症。在初次TKA中,局部应用TXA在减少输血和失血方面与静脉注射TXA疗效相似,且不会增加血栓栓塞并发症的风险。此外,当前的荟萃分析表明,三次静脉注射TXA有效且安全。我们还推荐使用2g局部应用TXA而非1g局部应用TXA,因为它在降低输血率和总失血量方面更有效,且不会增加血栓栓塞并发症。