Suppr超能文献

初次全髋关节置换术后氨甲环酸联合应用与局部及静脉应用的比较:一项荟萃分析

Combined application versus topical and intravenous application of tranexamic acid following primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Pei, Liang Yuan, Chen Pengtao, Fang Yongchao, He Jinshan, Wang Jingcheng

机构信息

Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, 116044, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Subei People's Hospital, Nantong West Road 98, Yangzhou, 225001, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 21;18(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1429-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of intravenous (IV) or topical tranexamic acid (TXA) in total hip arthroplasty has been proven to be effective and safe in total hip arthroplasty. However, which of these two administration routes is better has not been determined. The combined administration of TXA has been used in total knee arthroplasty with satisfactory results. We hypothesized that combined application of TXA may be the most effective way without increased rate of thrombotic events such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolisms (PE) in patients subjected to primary total hip replacement (THA). A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of the combined use of tranexamic acid (TXA) relative to topical or intravenous (IV) use alone for treatment of primary THA. The outcomes included total blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin decline, transfusion rates, and the incidence rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolisms (PE).

METHODS

We searched electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, the Chinese Biomedical Literature database, the CNKI database, and Wanfang Data until September 2016. The references of the included articles were also checked for additional potentially relevant studies. There were no language restrictions for the search. The data of the included studies were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 1762 patients. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that total blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin decline, and transfusion rates were significantly lower for patients that received the combined treatment compared to patients that received either topical or intravenous administration of TXA. No statistical differences were found in the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE).

CONCLUSION

The group that received the combined treatment had lower total blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin decline, and transfusion rates without an increased rate of thrombotic events (DVT or PE). The topical or intravenous use of TXA in primary THA is generally considered to be safe and effective. This meta-analysis demonstrated that combined TXA application may be superior to topical or intravenous application of TXA alone. However, larger, high-quality randomized control trials are required for greater confidence in this finding.

摘要

背景

静脉注射(IV)或局部应用氨甲环酸(TXA)在全髋关节置换术中已被证明是有效且安全的。然而,这两种给药途径哪种更好尚未确定。TXA的联合给药已用于全膝关节置换术并取得了满意的效果。我们假设,在接受初次全髋关节置换(THA)的患者中,联合应用TXA可能是最有效的方法,且不会增加深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)等血栓事件的发生率。进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较联合使用氨甲环酸(TXA)与单独局部或静脉注射(IV)使用TXA治疗初次THA的疗效和安全性。结果包括总失血量、术后血红蛋白下降、输血率以及深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)的发生率。

方法

我们检索了电子数据库,包括PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、CNKI数据库和万方数据,检索截至2016年9月。还检查了纳入文章的参考文献以寻找其他潜在相关研究。检索没有语言限制。使用RevMan 5.3软件分析纳入研究的数据。

结果

七项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入1762例患者。我们的荟萃分析表明,与接受局部或静脉注射TXA的患者相比,接受联合治疗的患者总失血量、术后血红蛋白下降和输血率显著更低。深静脉血栓形成(DVT)或肺栓塞(PE)的发生率未发现统计学差异。

结论

接受联合治疗的组总失血量、术后血红蛋白下降和输血率更低,且血栓事件(DVT或PE)发生率未增加。在初次THA中局部或静脉注射使用TXA通常被认为是安全有效的。这项荟萃分析表明,联合应用TXA可能优于单独局部或静脉注射应用TXA。然而,需要更大规模、高质量的随机对照试验来增强对这一发现的信心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7506/5320770/8b46e7019949/12891_2017_1429_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验