Opriessnig Tanja, Gerber Priscilla F, Matzinger Shannon R, Meng Xiang-Jin, Halbur Patrick G
The Roslin Institute and The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, UK; Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
The Roslin Institute and The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland, UK.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2017 Sep;191:51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
Porcine parvovirus type 1 (PPV1) and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) are small single-stranded DNA viruses with high prevalence in the global pig population. The aim of this study was to compare and contrast PCV2 and PPV1 infections in high-health status pigs and to describe PCV2 long-term infection dynamics. Six caesarian-derived colostrum-deprived pigs were randomly divided into two groups and were experimentally infected with PCV2 or PPV1 at 5 weeks of age. All pigs had detectable viremia by day (D) 3 post-infection. Pigs infected with PPV1 had a detectable INF-α response by D3 followed by a high IFN-γ response by D6. The PPV1 pigs developed antibodies against PPV1 by D6 resulting in decreasing virus titers until PPV1 DNA became undetectable from D28 until D42. In contrast, PCV2-infected pigs had no detectable INF-α or IFN-γ response after PCV2 infection. PCV2-infected pigs had no detectable anti-PCV2 humoral response until D49 and had a sustained high level of PCV2 DNA for the duration of the study. While PPV1-infected pigs were clinically normal, PCV2-infected pigs developed severe clinical illness including fatal systemic porcine circovirus associated disease (PCVAD) by D28, fatal enteric PCVAD by D56 and chronic PCVAD manifested as decreased weight gain and periods of diarrhea. Microscopically, all three PCV2-infected pigs had lymphoid lesions consistent with PCVAD and associated with low (chronic disease) to high (acute disease) levels of PCV2 antigen. Under the study conditions, there was a lack of early IFN-γ and INF-α activation followed by a delayed and low humoral immune response and persisting viremia with PCV2 infection. In contrast, PPV1-infected pigs had IFN-γ and INF-α activation and an effective immune response to the PPV1 infection.
1型猪细小病毒(PPV1)和2型猪圆环病毒(PCV2)是单链DNA小病毒,在全球猪群中具有高流行率。本研究的目的是比较和对比高健康状态猪的PCV2和PPV1感染,并描述PCV2的长期感染动态。六头剖腹产获得的初乳缺乏仔猪被随机分为两组,在5周龄时分别用PCV2或PPV1进行实验性感染。所有猪在感染后第3天(D3)均检测到病毒血症。感染PPV1的猪在D3时可检测到INF-α反应,随后在D6时出现高IFN-γ反应。PPV1感染的猪在D6时产生了针对PPV1的抗体,导致病毒滴度下降,直至从D28到D42时PPV1 DNA检测不到。相比之下,PCV2感染的猪在感染PCV2后未检测到INF-α或IFN-γ反应。PCV2感染的猪直到D49才检测到抗PCV2体液反应,并且在研究期间PCV2 DNA持续处于高水平。虽然PPV1感染的猪临床正常,但PCV2感染的猪出现了严重的临床疾病,包括在D28时出现致命的全身性猪圆环病毒相关疾病(PCVAD),在D56时出现致命的肠道PCVAD,以及表现为体重增加减少和腹泻期的慢性PCVAD。在显微镜下,所有三头PCV2感染的猪都有与PCVAD一致的淋巴样病变,并与低(慢性病)至高(急性病)水平的PCV2抗原相关。在研究条件下,PCV2感染缺乏早期IFN-γ和INF-α激活,随后是延迟且低水平的体液免疫反应以及持续的病毒血症。相比之下,PPV1感染的猪有IFN-γ和INF-α激活,并且对PPV1感染有有效的免疫反应。