Suppr超能文献

通过无上下文编码缺失数据改进研究中的数据共享。

Improving data sharing in research with context-free encoded missing data.

作者信息

Hoevenaar-Blom Marieke P, Guillemont Juliette, Ngandu Tiia, Beishuizen Cathrien R L, Coley Nicola, Moll van Charante Eric P, Andrieu Sandrine, Kivipelto Miia, Soininen Hilkka, Brayne Carol, Meiller Yannick, Richard Edo

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

INSERM, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Sep 12;12(9):e0182362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182362. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Lack of attention to missing data in research may result in biased results, loss of power and reduced generalizability. Registering reasons for missing values at the time of data collection, or-in the case of sharing existing data-before making data available to other teams, can save time and efforts, improve scientific value and help to prevent erroneous assumptions and biased results. To ensure that encoding of missing data is sufficient to understand the reason why data are missing, it should ideally be context-free. Therefore, 11 context-free codes of missing data were carefully designed based on three completed randomized controlled clinical trials and tested in a new randomized controlled clinical trial by an international team consisting of clinical researchers and epidemiologists with extended experience in designing and conducting trials and an Information System expert. These codes can be divided into missing due to participant and/or participation characteristics (n = 6), missing by design (n = 4), and due to a procedural error (n = 1). Broad implementation of context-free missing data encoding may enhance the possibilities of data sharing and pooling, thus allowing more powerful analyses using existing data.

摘要

研究中对缺失数据缺乏关注可能会导致结果有偏差、效能降低和普遍性下降。在数据收集时记录缺失值的原因,或者——在共享现有数据的情况下——在将数据提供给其他团队之前记录原因,可以节省时间和精力,提高科学价值,并有助于防止错误的假设和有偏差的结果。为确保缺失数据的编码足以理解数据缺失的原因,理想情况下它应该是无背景的。因此,基于三项完成的随机对照临床试验,精心设计了11种无背景的缺失数据编码,并由一个由临床研究人员、在设计和开展试验方面有丰富经验的流行病学家以及一名信息系统专家组成的国际团队,在一项新的随机对照临床试验中进行了测试。这些编码可分为因参与者和/或参与特征导致的缺失(n = 6)、设计导致的缺失(n = 4)以及程序错误导致的缺失(n = 1)。广泛实施无背景的缺失数据编码可能会增加数据共享和合并的可能性,从而允许使用现有数据进行更有力的分析。

相似文献

4
Researchers' Experience with Clinical Data Sharing.研究人员在临床数据共享方面的经验。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Nov 12;29(6):805-807. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.06.160198.
6
Conditions for making trial data available to other investigators.
BMJ. 2016 Mar 21;352:i1573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1573.
7
Data Sharing and Cardiology: Platforms and Possibilities.数据共享与心脏病学:平台与可能性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70(24):3018-3025. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.037.
9
Clinical trial data sharing: here's the challenge.临床试验数据共享:挑战在于此。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 21;9(8):e032334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032334.

本文引用的文献

6
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.研究证据生产与报告中的可避免浪费。
Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):86-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9. Epub 2009 Jun 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验