Galván Gonzalo, Sánchez-Carballo Álvaro, Gómez-Morales Ileana, Humánez-Julio Oscar, Guerrero-Martelo Manuel, Vásquez De la Hoz Francisco
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia sede Montería, Córdoba, Colombia. Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Colombia. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral, Santa Cruz, Argentina.
Vertex. 2016 Nov;XXVII(130):434-442.
Descriptive and comparative study of cross-sectional that had as objective to evaluate and compare the beliefs about cannabis, its use and potential consequences between two groups of Colombian university students, matched by gender and age. The frst group consisted of ordinary consumers of cannabis (n=35) the second group consisted of students that have never tried cannabis (n=35). The results showed that the group of consumers presents a moderate risk of abuse and only the 20% fulflled dependence criteria. Furthermore, the non-consumers group was mostly agree about that the marijuana use: damages the memory, deteriorates the cognitive functions, creates dependency, can affect the neurons and mental health. Also, it can lead to legal problems, it is a harmful drug for the health, it affects the academic performance, it creates problems with the family, friends, couple and the like, it reduces the driving ability, and, that the marijuana that is sold in the street is always pure. The consumer group, instead, agreed that smoking tobacco affects the lungs more than smoking marijuana. Marijuana has a positive in?uence on the brain, it increases the creativity, and it is less damaging than alcohol and tobacco. Smart people smoke marijuana and it has medicinal effects. In conclusion, according to the kind of beliefs that they have about this drug, the cannabis consumers would have a decreased perception of risk in relation to the potential risk that the consumption brings from two points of view: a. They minimize the real risks of consuming and, b. They attribute some benefts and virtues to the cannabis. The kind of beliefs that the consumer have are maybe in?uenced, at least, in part, for experiences of family and other consumers and, furthermore, the reinforcement of the same consume.
一项横断面描述性和比较性研究,旨在评估和比较两组按性别和年龄匹配的哥伦比亚大学生对大麻、其使用及潜在后果的看法。第一组由大麻普通消费者组成(n = 35),第二组由从未尝试过大麻的学生组成(n = 35)。结果显示,消费者组存在中度滥用风险,只有20%符合成瘾标准。此外,非消费者组大多认同大麻使用会损害记忆、恶化认知功能、导致成瘾、影响神经元和心理健康。同时,还会引发法律问题,是对健康有害的毒品,影响学业成绩,在家庭、朋友、伴侣等方面产生问题,降低驾驶能力,且街头售卖的大麻总是纯净的。相反,消费者组认为吸烟对肺部的影响比吸食大麻更大。大麻对大脑有积极影响,能提高创造力,比酒精和烟草危害小。聪明人吸食大麻且大麻有药用效果。总之,根据他们对这种毒品的看法类型,大麻消费者从两个角度对消费带来的潜在风险的风险认知会降低:a. 他们将消费的实际风险最小化;b. 他们赋予大麻一些益处和优点。消费者持有的看法类型可能至少部分受到家庭和其他消费者经历以及消费行为强化的影响。