Suppr超能文献

日本患者胆胰型 Oddi 括约肌功能障碍内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的危险因素。

Risk factors of post- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in biliary type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in Japanese patients.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

J Dig Dis. 2017 Oct;18(10):591-597. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12541.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a well-known risk factor for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). The indication of ERCP for suspected SOD patients was very low in Japan compared to other countries. Therefore, the risk of PEP may be different in Japanese SOD patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of PEP in suspected biliary type SOD in Japan.

METHODS

From December 1996 to January 2017, 72 patients were suspected as having biliary type SOD, by questionnaire, liver function tests, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, abdominal ultrasonography, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Finally, 60 patients who underwent ERCP were included in this study, and the factors associated with PEP were evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall PEP rate was 23.3% (n = 14). Diagnostic ERCP alone for SOD did not increase the risk of PEP. The correlation of PEP incidence with pancreatic duct guidewire (PGW) technique and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) was indicated in univariate and multivariate analysis. Pancreatic stent placement was a risk in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

PGW technique and EST for biliary type SOD were important risk factors for PEP. Pancreatic stenting was ineffective for prevention of PEP.

摘要

目的

Oddi 括约肌功能障碍(SOD)是内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)后胰腺炎(PEP)的一个已知危险因素。与其他国家相比,日本疑似 SOD 患者行 ERCP 的指征非常低。因此,日本 SOD 患者的 PEP 风险可能不同。本研究旨在评估日本疑似胆源性 SOD 患者发生 PEP 的风险。

方法

1996 年 12 月至 2017 年 1 月,通过问卷调查、肝功能检查、肝胆闪烁扫描、腹部超声、上消化道内镜、内镜超声和磁共振胰胆管造影,对 72 例疑似胆源性 SOD 患者进行评估。最终,60 例接受 ERCP 的患者纳入本研究,并对 PEP 的相关因素进行评估。

结果

总体 PEP 发生率为 23.3%(n=14)。单独为 SOD 行诊断性 ERCP 并未增加 PEP 的风险。单因素和多因素分析均表明,PGW 技术和 EST 与 PEP 发生率相关。胰管支架置入术在单因素分析中是 PEP 的危险因素,但在多因素分析中并非如此。

结论

对于胆源性 SOD,PGW 技术和 EST 是 PEP 的重要危险因素。胰管支架置入术不能预防 PEP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验