• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FRAX vs CAROC for the Canadian Imaging Physician: An Existential Dilemma.

作者信息

Hammond Ian, Burrell Steven, Lyons David J, Lentle Brian C

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017 Nov;68(4):445-446. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.carj.2017.08.002
PMID:28899596
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
FRAX vs CAROC for the Canadian Imaging Physician: An Existential Dilemma.对于加拿大影像科医生而言，FRAX与CAROC：一个关乎生存的困境。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017 Nov;68(4):445-446. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
2
Controversies Surrounding the BMD Reporting Standard for the Determination of 10-Year Absolute Fracture Risk: A Canadian Perspective.围绕用于确定 10 年绝对骨折风险的 BMD 报告标准的争议：加拿大视角。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021 Aug;72(3):483-489. doi: 10.1177/0846537120907655. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
3
Appropriate osteoporosis treatment by family physicians in response to FRAX vs CAROC reporting: results from a randomized controlled trial.家庭医生针对FRAX与CAROC报告进行的适当骨质疏松症治疗：一项随机对照试验的结果
J Clin Densitom. 2014 Oct-Dec;17(4):458-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
4
Evaluation of Automated Fracture Risk Assessment Based on the Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada Assessment Tool.基于加拿大放射学家协会和加拿大骨质疏松症协会评估工具的自动骨折风险评估评价
J Clin Densitom. 2016 Jul-Sep;19(3):332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
Worldwide Fracture Prediction.全球骨折预测
J Clin Densitom. 2017 Jul-Sep;20(3):397-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
6
Use of FRAX as a determinant for risk-based osteoporosis screening may decrease unnecessary testing while improving the odds of identifying treatment candidates.使用FRAX作为基于风险的骨质疏松症筛查的决定因素，可能会减少不必要的检测，同时提高识别治疗候选者的几率。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Nov-Dec;24(6):629-34. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
7
Validation of three tools for identifying painful new osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older Chinese men: bone mineral density, Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians, and fracture risk assessment tool.三种用于识别中国老年男性疼痛性新发骨质疏松性椎体骨折工具的验证：骨密度、亚洲人骨质疏松自我评估工具和骨折风险评估工具。
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Apr 22;11:461-9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S101078. eCollection 2016.
8
Estimating osteoporotic fracture risk following a wrist fracture: a tale of two systems.评估腕部骨折后骨质疏松性骨折风险：两种系统的故事。
Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:13. doi: 10.1007/s11657-015-0218-3. Epub 2015 May 9.
9
Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.数字X线摄影测量法在骨质疏松性骨折研究中的应用：与双能X线吸收法及FRAX的比较
Bone. 2016 May;86:30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
10
Letter to the Editor on "Appropriate Osteoporosis Treatment by Family Physicians in Response to FRAX vs CAROC Reporting: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial".
J Clin Densitom. 2015 Apr-Jun;18(2):270. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.02.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of 2 fracture risk estimation processes in Alberta: a cross-sectional chart review.艾伯塔省两种骨折风险评估流程的比较：一项横断面图表回顾。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jun 23;9(2):E711-E717. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200207. Print 2021 Apr-Jun.