• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围绕用于确定 10 年绝对骨折风险的 BMD 报告标准的争议:加拿大视角。

Controversies Surrounding the BMD Reporting Standard for the Determination of 10-Year Absolute Fracture Risk: A Canadian Perspective.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 3158University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, 3158University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021 Aug;72(3):483-489. doi: 10.1177/0846537120907655. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1177/0846537120907655
PMID:32162532
Abstract

The Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada currently endorse a fracture risk prediction tool called CAROC. It has been used in Canada since 2005 with an update in 2010. It is an integral part of bone mineral densitometry reporting across the country. New osteoporosis guidelines from Osteoporosis Canada (OC) are expected in the near future. There has been pressure on radiologists to report fracture risk using an alternative fracture risk prediction platform called FRAX. In addition, OC collaborated in the development of the Canadian FRAX model and has been copromoting both FRAX and CAROC, raising the prospect that new guidelines may seek to replace CAROC with FRAX for fracture risk determination. A number of concerns have been raised about FRAX, including: (1) FRAX has not released its algorithms to the public domain with the consequence that it is impossible to verify results for an individual patient; (2) FRAX has incorrectly claimed that it was developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and has used this affiliation to promote itself until recently ordered by the WHO to desist; (3) FRAX requires collection of additional clinical information beyond that needed for CAROC, and this patient-reported medical data is prone to substantial error; and (4) despite claims to the contrary, there are no valid studies comparing FRAX to CAROC. We believe it is important that radiologists be aware of these issues in order to provide input into future Technical Standards for Bone Mineral Densitometry Reporting of the Canadian Association of Radiologists.

摘要

加拿大放射学家协会和加拿大骨质疏松症协会目前支持一种名为 CAROC 的骨折风险预测工具。自 2005 年以来,该工具在加拿大得到使用,并于 2010 年进行了更新。它是全国骨密度计报告的一个组成部分。加拿大骨质疏松症协会(OC)的新骨质疏松症指南预计在不久的将来发布。放射科医生面临使用另一种名为 FRAX 的骨折风险预测平台报告骨折风险的压力。此外,OC 参与了加拿大 FRAX 模型的开发,并共同推广 FRAX 和 CAROC,这使得新的指南可能会寻求用 FRAX 取代 CAROC 来确定骨折风险。人们对 FRAX 提出了一些担忧,包括:(1)FRAX 尚未将其算法公开,因此无法验证个体患者的结果;(2)FRAX 错误地声称它是由世界卫生组织(WHO)开发的,并利用这种关联来推广自己,直到最近才被 WHO 命令停止;(3)FRAX 需要收集比 CAROC 所需的额外临床信息,并且这种患者报告的医疗数据容易出现重大错误;(4)尽管有相反的说法,但没有有效的研究将 FRAX 与 CAROC 进行比较。我们认为,放射科医生了解这些问题非常重要,以便为加拿大放射学家协会的骨矿物质密度计报告技术标准提供意见。

相似文献

1
Controversies Surrounding the BMD Reporting Standard for the Determination of 10-Year Absolute Fracture Risk: A Canadian Perspective.围绕用于确定 10 年绝对骨折风险的 BMD 报告标准的争议:加拿大视角。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021 Aug;72(3):483-489. doi: 10.1177/0846537120907655. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
Construction and validation of a simplified fracture risk assessment tool for Canadian women and men: results from the CaMos and Manitoba cohorts.构建和验证加拿大男女简化骨折风险评估工具:来自 CaMos 和马尼托巴队列的结果。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Jun;22(6):1873-83. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1445-5. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
3
Direct comparison of FRAX(R) and a simplified fracture risk assessment tool in routine clinical practice: a registry-based cohort study.FRAX(R)与一种简化骨折风险评估工具在常规临床实践中的直接比较:一项基于注册登记的队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Sep;27(9):2689-2695. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3613-8. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
4
Appropriate osteoporosis treatment by family physicians in response to FRAX vs CAROC reporting: results from a randomized controlled trial.家庭医生针对FRAX与CAROC报告进行的适当骨质疏松症治疗:一项随机对照试验的结果
J Clin Densitom. 2014 Oct-Dec;17(4):458-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
5
Comparison of 2 fracture risk estimation processes in Alberta: a cross-sectional chart review.艾伯塔省两种骨折风险评估流程的比较:一项横断面图表回顾。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jun 23;9(2):E711-E717. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200207. Print 2021 Apr-Jun.
6
Worldwide Fracture Prediction.全球骨折预测
J Clin Densitom. 2017 Jul-Sep;20(3):397-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
7
Evaluation of Automated Fracture Risk Assessment Based on the Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada Assessment Tool.基于加拿大放射学家协会和加拿大骨质疏松症协会评估工具的自动骨折风险评估评价
J Clin Densitom. 2016 Jul-Sep;19(3):332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
8
Estimating osteoporotic fracture risk following a wrist fracture: a tale of two systems.评估腕部骨折后骨质疏松性骨折风险:两种系统的故事。
Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:13. doi: 10.1007/s11657-015-0218-3. Epub 2015 May 9.
9
The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®): applications in clinical practice.骨折风险评估工具(FRAX®):临床实践中的应用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Apr;20(4):525-31. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2294. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
10
FRAX vs CAROC for the Canadian Imaging Physician: An Existential Dilemma.对于加拿大影像科医生而言,FRAX与CAROC:一个关乎生存的困境。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017 Nov;68(4):445-446. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 9.