Adegbola Samuel O, Sahnan Kapil, Tozer Philip J, Phillips Robin Ks, Faiz Omar D, Warusavitarne Janindra, Hart Ailsa
Surgical Epidemiology, Trials and Outcome Centre (SETOC), St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK.
Department of Surgery, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;32(11):1539-1544. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2899-0. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Perianal fistulising Crohn's disease (PFCD) affects a third of Crohn's disease patients and represents a disabling phenotype with poor outcome. The anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF) therapies have been shown to maintain clinical remission in a third of patients after 1 year of treatment. Maintenance therapy with systematic administration schedules confers greatest benefit, but exposes patients to risks/side effects of continued systemic use and led to consideration of local drug delivery (first described in 2000). In this review, we analyse all published articles on local anti-TNF therapy in the treatment of PFCD.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to systematically search Medline and Embase using the medical subject headings 'fistula', 'anus', 'Crohn disease', 'infliximab' and 'adalimumab'. This was combined with free text searches, e.g. 'local injection' and 'Crohn's perianal disease'. Studies/abstracts describing local injection treatment with anti-TNF were included in this review.
Six pilot studies including a total of 92 patients were included in this review. Outcomes reported were mostly clinical and included 'complete/partial response' to therapy and short-term results varied between 40 and 100%. There were no significant adverse events and the local injections were well tolerated.
There is paucity of data assessing this treatment modality. Local anti-TNF therapy appears safe, but outcome reporting is heterogeneous, subjective and long-term data are unavailable. Our review suggests a potential role may be in those in whom systemic treatment is contraindicated and calls for standardised reporting of outcomes in this field to enable better data interpretation.
肛周瘘管性克罗恩病(PFCD)影响三分之一的克罗恩病患者,是一种致残表型,预后较差。抗肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF)疗法已被证明在治疗1年后可使三分之一的患者维持临床缓解。采用系统性给药方案的维持治疗带来的益处最大,但会使患者面临持续全身用药的风险/副作用,因此人们开始考虑局部给药(2000年首次描述)。在本综述中,我们分析了所有已发表的关于局部抗TNF疗法治疗PFCD的文章。
使用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,通过医学主题词“瘘管”“肛门”“克罗恩病”“英夫利昔单抗”和“阿达木单抗”对Medline和Embase进行系统检索。这与自由文本检索相结合,例如“局部注射”和“克罗恩肛周疾病”。描述抗TNF局部注射治疗的研究/摘要被纳入本综述。
本综述纳入了6项试点研究,共92例患者。报告的结果大多是临床结果,包括治疗的“完全/部分缓解”,短期缓解率在40%至100%之间。没有显著的不良事件,局部注射耐受性良好。
评估这种治疗方式的数据较少。局部抗TNF疗法似乎是安全的,但结果报告存在异质性、主观性,且缺乏长期数据。我们的综述表明,其潜在作用可能在于那些禁忌全身治疗的患者,并呼吁在该领域进行标准化的结果报告,以便更好地解读数据。