Center for Science, Technology, and Environmental Policy, Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Oct 17;51(20):12035-12045. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03176. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
This paper develops a methodology for individual cities to use to analyze the in- and trans-boundary water, greenhouse gas (GHG), and land impacts of city-scale food system actions. Applied to Delhi, India, the analysis demonstrates that city-scale action can rival typical food policy interventions that occur at larger scales, although no single city-scale action can rival in all three environmental impacts. In particular, improved food-waste management within the city (7% system-wide GHG reduction) matches the GHG impact of preconsumer trans-boundary food waste reduction. The systems approach is particularly useful in illustrating key trade-offs and co-benefits. For instance, multiple diet shifts that can reduce GHG emissions have trade-offs that increase water and land impacts. Vertical farming technology (VFT) with current applications for fruits and vegetables can provide modest system-wide water (4%) and land reductions (3%), although implementation within the city itself may raise questions of constraints in water-stressed cities, with such a shift in Delhi increasing community-wide direct water use by 16%. Improving the nutrition status for the bottom 50% of the population to the median diet is accompanied by proportionally smaller increases of water, GHG, and land impacts (4%, 9%, and 8%, systemwide): increases that can be offset through simultaneous city-scale actions, e.g., improved food-waste management and VFT.
本文开发了一种方法,供各个城市用于分析城市规模食品系统行动对境内和跨境水、温室气体(GHG)和土地的影响。将该方法应用于印度德里,分析表明,尽管没有单一的城市规模行动可以在所有三个环境影响方面相媲美,但城市规模的行动可以与更大规模发生的典型食品政策干预相媲美。特别是,城市内部改善食物垃圾管理(减少 7%的系统范围 GHG)与减少跨境食物浪费前的 GHG 影响相匹配。系统方法特别有助于说明关键的权衡和共同效益。例如,多种可以减少温室气体排放的饮食转变存在增加水和土地影响的权衡。目前应用于水果和蔬菜的垂直农业技术(VFT)可以适度减少系统范围的水(4%)和土地(3%),尽管在城市内部实施可能会引发对水资源紧张城市的限制问题,因为这种转变会使德里全市的社区直接用水量增加 16%。将最底层 50%人口的营养状况提高到中等饮食水平,相应地增加水、GHG 和土地的影响(分别为 4%、9%和 8%,系统范围内):这些增加可以通过同时采取城市规模的行动来抵消,例如,改善食物垃圾管理和 VFT。