Sosis M, Stiner A, Larijani G E, Marr A T
Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.
Br J Anaesth. 1987 Oct;59(10):1236-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.10.1236.
Priming with vecuronium was evaluated in three groups of patients. Group 1 (n = 10) received tubocurarine 0.05 mg kg-1, group 2 (n = 19) received physiological saline and group 3 (n = 21) received vecuronium 0.012 mg kg-1. After 4 min maximum inspiratory pressure was measured. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone 6-8 mg kg-1 and controlled ventilation with nitrous oxide and oxygen via a face mask instituted. The ulnar nerve was stimulated at the wrist. At 5 min group 1 patients received suxamethonium 1.5 mg kg-1, group 2 received vecuronium 0.072 mg kg-1, and group 3 received vecuronium 0.060 mg kg-1. Intubation was accomplished at 6.5 min in all patients in group 1, 89% in group 2 and 90% in group 3. Patients in group 1 had no twitch response to stimulation at the time of intubation. Mean T4:T1 ratios at 6.5 min were 0.82 in group 2 and 0.61 in group 3 (P less than 0.05). Intubating conditions were excellent in all group 1 patients, and in 53% and 67% of groups 2 and 3, respectively. Two patients in group 3 did not tolerate the priming dose and many had subjective complaints. Four group 3 patients could not sustain head lift and five showed decreased inspiratory pressure. Priming did not improve intubating conditions when compared with a single bolus technique and was not well tolerated.
在三组患者中评估了维库溴铵预注法。第一组(n = 10)接受0.05 mg/kg的筒箭毒碱,第二组(n = 19)接受生理盐水,第三组(n = 21)接受0.012 mg/kg的维库溴铵。4分钟后测量最大吸气压力。用6 - 8 mg/kg的硫喷妥钠诱导麻醉,并通过面罩用氧化亚氮和氧气进行控制通气。在腕部刺激尺神经。5分钟时,第一组患者接受1.5 mg/kg的琥珀胆碱,第二组接受0.072 mg/kg的维库溴铵,第三组接受0.060 mg/kg的维库溴铵。第一组所有患者在6.5分钟时完成插管,第二组为89%,第三组为90%。第一组患者在插管时对刺激无抽搐反应。6.5分钟时第二组的平均T4:T1比值为0.82,第三组为0.61(P < 0.05)。第一组所有患者的插管条件极佳,第二组和第三组分别为53%和67%。第三组有两名患者不能耐受预注剂量,许多患者有主观不适。第三组有四名患者不能维持抬头动作,五名患者吸气压力降低。与单次推注技术相比,预注法并未改善插管条件,且耐受性不佳。