• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交动机和主体间动机与群体间动机可以预测个体对地位与权力的偏好。

Communal and Agentic Interpersonal and Intergroup Motives Predict Preferences for Status Versus Power.

机构信息

1 University of Idaho, Moscow, USA.

2 University of Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Jan;43(1):71-86. doi: 10.1177/0146167216675333.

DOI:10.1177/0146167216675333
PMID:28903646
Abstract

Seven studies involving 1,343 participants showed how circumplex models of social motives can help explain individual differences in preferences for status (having others' admiration) versus power (controlling valuable resources). Studies 1 to 3 and 7 concerned interpersonal motives in workplace contexts, and found that stronger communal motives (to have mutual trust, support, and cooperation) predicted being more attracted to status (but not power) and achieving more workplace status, while stronger agentic motives (to be firm, decisive, and influential) predicted being more attracted to and achieving more workplace power, and experiencing a stronger connection between workplace power and job satisfaction. Studies 4 to 6 found similar effects for intergroup motives: Stronger communal motives predicted wanting one's ingroup (e.g., country) to have status-but not power-relative to other groups. Finally, most people preferred status over power, and this was especially true for women, which was partially explained by women having stronger communal motives.

摘要

七项研究涉及 1343 名参与者,展示了社会动机的双因素模型如何有助于解释个体对地位(获得他人的钦佩)和权力(控制有价值的资源)偏好的差异。研究 1 至 3 和 7 涉及工作场所背景下的人际动机,发现更强的社群动机(相互信任、支持和合作)预测对地位(而非权力)更具吸引力,并在工作场所中获得更高的地位,而更强的能动动机(坚定、果断和有影响力)预测对权力更具吸引力并取得更多的权力,并体验到工作场所权力与工作满意度之间更强的联系。研究 4 至 6 发现群体间动机也有类似的影响:更强的社群动机预测一个人的内群体(例如,国家)相对于其他群体具有更高的地位,但不是权力。最后,大多数人更喜欢地位而不是权力,这对女性来说尤其如此,这部分是由于女性有更强的社群动机。

相似文献

1
Communal and Agentic Interpersonal and Intergroup Motives Predict Preferences for Status Versus Power.社交动机和主体间动机与群体间动机可以预测个体对地位与权力的偏好。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Jan;43(1):71-86. doi: 10.1177/0146167216675333.
2
Communal narcissism.集体自恋。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):854-78. doi: 10.1037/a0029629. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
3
Circumplex Scales of Intergroup Goals: an interpersonal circle model of goals for interactions between groups.群体间目标的环形量表:群体间互动目标的人际圈模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Apr;40(4):433-49. doi: 10.1177/0146167213514280. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
4
Agency-communion and interest in prosocial behavior: social motives for assimilation and contrast explain sociocultural inconsistencies.机构归属感与亲社会行为兴趣:同化与对比的社会动机解释了社会文化上的不一致。
J Pers. 2014 Oct;82(5):452-66. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12076. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
5
Interpersonal Complementarity and Affect in Daily Life.日常生活中的人际互补性与情感
Motiv Emot. 2023 Apr;47(2):270-281. doi: 10.1007/s11031-022-10003-0. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
6
Motivational pursuits in the context of human sexual relationships.人类性关系中的动机追求。
J Pers. 2011 Dec;79(6):1333-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00713.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
7
How interpersonal motives clarify the meaning of interpersonal behavior: a revised circumplex model.人际动机如何阐明人际行为的意义:一种修正的环形模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(1):67-86. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_4.
8
Assessing implicit motivational orientations in couple relationships: the Partner-Related Agency and Communion Test (PACT).评估伴侣关系中的内隐动机取向:伴侣相关自主性与关联性测验(PACT)。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Mar;24(1):114-28. doi: 10.1037/a0024822. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
9
Generativity in midlife and young adults: links to agency, communion and subjective well-being.中年及青年的繁衍力:与能动性、社交性和主观幸福感的联系。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2000;50(1):17-41. doi: 10.2190/9F51-LR6T-JHRJ-2QW6.
10
The effects of individual and context on aggression in repeated social interaction.个体和环境因素对重复社会互动中侵犯行为的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2013 Sep;44(5):710-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.04.014. Epub 2012 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Motives relate to cooperation in social dilemmas but have an inconsistent association with leadership evaluation.动机与社会困境中的合作有关,但与领导力评价的关联不一致。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 12;9(1):10118. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45931-4.