1 Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.
2 University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Sep;43(9):1337-1352. doi: 10.1177/0146167217713191. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
Maslow's self-actualization remains a popular notion in academic research as well as popular culture. The notion that life's highest calling is fulfilling one's own unique potential has been widely appealing. But what do people believe they are doing when they pursue the realization of their full, unique potentials? Here, we examine lay perceptions of self-actualization. Self-actualizing, like any drive, is unlikely to operate without regard to biological and social costs and benefits. We examine which functional outcomes (e.g., gaining status, making friends, finding mates, caring for kin) people perceive as central to their individual self-actualizing. Three studies suggest that people most frequently link self-actualization to seeking status, and, concordant with life history theory, what people regard as self-actualizing varies in predictable ways across the life span and across individuals. Contrasting with self-actualization, people do not view other types of well-being-eudaimonic, hedonic, subjective-as furthering status-linked functional outcomes.
马斯洛的自我实现仍然是学术研究和流行文化中的一个流行概念。人生的最高使命是实现自己独特的潜力,这一观念具有广泛的吸引力。但是,当人们追求充分发挥自己独特潜力时,他们认为自己在做什么呢?在这里,我们探讨了对自我实现的普遍看法。自我实现,就像任何驱动力一样,不太可能在不考虑生物和社会成本和收益的情况下运作。我们探讨了人们认为哪些功能结果(例如获得地位、结交朋友、寻找伴侣、照顾亲属)对个人的自我实现至关重要。三项研究表明,人们最常将自我实现与寻求地位联系起来,并且与生活史理论一致,人们认为自我实现会随着生命周期和个体的不同而以可预测的方式变化。与自我实现不同的是,人们并不认为其他类型的幸福感——如幸福论、享乐主义、主观幸福感——会促进与地位相关的功能结果。