Robinson Lacy, Cushman Samuel A, Lucid Michael K
Idaho Department of Fish and Game Coeur d'Alene ID USA.
Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative PO Box 733 Sandpoint ID USA.
Ecol Evol. 2017 Jul 27;7(17):6826-6838. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3158. eCollection 2017 Sep.
Winter bait stations are becoming a commonly used technique for multispecies inventory and monitoring but a technical evaluation of their effectiveness is lacking. Bait stations have three components: carcass attractant, remote camera, and hair snare. Our 22,975 km mountainous study area was stratified with a 5 × 5 km sampling grid centered on northern Idaho and including portions of Washington, Montana, and British Columbia. From 2010-14, we conducted 563 sampling sessions at 497 bait stations in 453 5 × 5 km cells. We evaluated the effectiveness of cameras and hair snare DNA collection at stations to detect species and individual animals, factors affecting DNA viability, the effectiveness of re-visiting stations, and the influence of elevation, seasonality, and latency on species detections. Cameras were more effective at detecting multiple species than DNA hair snaring. Length of deployment time and elevation increased genetic species ID success but individual ID success rates were increased only by collecting hairs earlier in the season. Re-visiting stations did not change camera or genetic species detection results but did increase the number of individual genotypes identified. Marten and fisher were detected quickly while bobcat and coyote showed longer latency to detection. Seasonality significantly affected coyote and bobcat detections but not marten, fisher, or weasel. Multispecies bait station study design should incorporate mixed elevation sites with stratified seasonality. Priority should be given to including cameras as components of bait stations over hair snares, unless there is a specific genetic goal to the study. A hair snare component should be added, however, if individual ID or genetic data are necessary. Winter stations should be deployed a minimum of 45-60 days to allow for detection of low density species and species with long latency to detection times. Hair samples should be collected prior to DNA-degrading late season rain events. Re-visiting stations does not change which species are detected at stations; therefore, studies with objectives to delineate species presence or distribution will be more effective if they focus on deploying more stations across a broader landscape in lieu of surveying the same site multiple times.
冬季诱饵站正成为一种常用的多物种清查和监测技术,但缺乏对其有效性的技术评估。诱饵站有三个组成部分:尸体引诱剂、远程摄像头和毛发陷阱。我们22975平方公里的山区研究区域以爱达荷州北部为中心,采用5×5公里的采样网格进行分层,包括华盛顿州、蒙大拿州和不列颠哥伦比亚省的部分地区。2010年至2014年期间,我们在453个5×5公里的单元格中的497个诱饵站进行了563次采样。我们评估了诱饵站的摄像头和毛发陷阱DNA采集在检测物种和个体动物方面的有效性、影响DNA活力的因素、重新访问诱饵站的有效性以及海拔、季节性和潜伏期对物种检测的影响。摄像头在检测多个物种方面比DNA毛发陷阱更有效。部署时间长度和海拔提高了遗传物种识别成功率,但个体识别成功率仅通过在季节早期采集毛发而提高。重新访问诱饵站并没有改变摄像头或遗传物种检测结果,但确实增加了识别出的个体基因型数量。貂和渔貂被快速检测到,而短尾猫和郊狼的检测潜伏期较长。季节性显著影响郊狼和短尾猫的检测,但不影响貂、渔貂或鼬。多物种诱饵站研究设计应纳入具有分层季节性的混合海拔地点。除非研究有特定的遗传目标,否则应优先将摄像头作为诱饵站的组成部分,而非毛发陷阱。然而,如果需要个体识别或遗传数据,则应添加毛发陷阱组件。冬季诱饵站应至少部署45 - 60天,以允许检测低密度物种和检测潜伏期长的物种。应在DNA降解的季末降雨事件之前收集毛发样本。重新访问诱饵站并不会改变在站点检测到的物种;因此,旨在描绘物种存在或分布的研究如果侧重于在更广阔的区域部署更多站点,而不是多次调查同一地点,将会更有效。