Suppr超能文献

彩色多普勒和频谱多普勒超声检测强直性脊柱炎活动性骶髂关节炎与体格检查作为金标准的比较。

Color Doppler and spectral Doppler ultrasound detection of active sacroiliitis in spondyloarthritis compared to physical examination as gold standard.

机构信息

Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario la Paz, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2017 Dec;37(12):2043-2047. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3813-3. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

Abstract

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) involvement is a distinctive feature of spondyloarthritis (SpA). The main objective of this study was to assess the validity of color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) in SIJ. This was a cross-sectional, blinded, case-control study of 108 cases divided into three groups: (a) 53 SpA patients with inflammatory back pain (IBP); (b) 28 SpA patients with no IBP; and (c) 27 healthy mechanical lumbar pain subjects. Physical examinations of the SIJs were assessed as positive or negative in each SIJ and were used as the gold standard. SIJs were examined with CDUS and spectral Doppler, and the SIJs were assessed as positive when both color Doppler and the resistance index (RI) were less than the cut-off point within the SIJs area. A total of 108 cases (53 female; mean age 36 ± 10 years old) were studied. The physical examination of the SIJs was positive in 38 patients (59 SIJs). Ultrasound detected Doppler signal within the SIJs in 37 cases (58 SIJs): 33 of them had symptomatic SpA (52 SIJs), 3 of them had asymptomatic SpA (5 SIJs), and 1 was a healthy control (1 SIJ). The accuracy of CDUS, when compared to physical SIJ examination, at the patient level in the overall group had a sensitivity of 70.3%, a specificity of 85.7%, a positive likelihood ratio of 4.9, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.36. For the spectral Doppler RI, with an optimal cut-off point ≤0.75, the sensitivity was 76.2%, and the specificity was 77.8%. CDUS of SIJs seems to be a feasible and valid method for detecting active inflammation in patients with SpA.

摘要

骶髂关节 (SIJ) 受累是脊柱关节炎 (SpA) 的一个显著特征。本研究的主要目的是评估彩色多普勒超声 (CDUS) 在 SIJ 中的有效性。这是一项横断面、盲法、病例对照研究,共纳入 108 例患者,分为三组:(a) 53 例有炎症性背痛 (IBP) 的 SpA 患者;(b) 28 例无 IBP 的 SpA 患者;和 (c) 27 例健康机械性腰痛受试者。在每个 SIJ 中,通过体格检查评估 SIJ 是否为阳性或阴性,并将其作为金标准。使用 CDUS 和频谱多普勒对 SIJ 进行检查,如果在 SIJ 区域内彩色多普勒和阻力指数 (RI) 均低于截止值,则将 SIJ 评估为阳性。共纳入 108 例患者(53 例女性;平均年龄 36±10 岁)。SIJ 体格检查阳性的患者有 38 例(59 个 SIJ)。超声在 37 例(58 个 SIJ)中检测到 SIJ 内的多普勒信号:其中 33 例为有症状的 SpA(52 个 SIJ),3 例为无症状的 SpA(5 个 SIJ),1 例为健康对照(1 个 SIJ)。在整个组中,与 SIJ 体格检查相比,CDUS 在患者水平上的准确性,其敏感性为 70.3%,特异性为 85.7%,阳性似然比为 4.9,阴性似然比为 0.36。对于频谱多普勒 RI,以最佳截断点≤0.75 为标准,敏感性为 76.2%,特异性为 77.8%。CDUS 似乎是一种可行且有效的方法,可用于检测 SpA 患者的活动性炎症。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验