• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估印度水气候干扰对生态系统弹性的影响。

Assessment of ecosystem resilience to hydroclimatic disturbances in India.

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, India.

出版信息

Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Feb;24(2):e432-e441. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13874. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1111/gcb.13874
PMID:28905461
Abstract

Recent studies have shown an increasing trend in hydroclimatic disturbances like droughts, which are anticipated to become more frequent and intense under global warming and climate change. Droughts adversely affect the vegetation growth and crop yield, which enhances the risks to food security for a country like India with over 1.2 billion people to feed. Here, we compared the response of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP) to hydroclimatic disturbances in India at different scales (i.e., at river basins, land covers, and climate types) to examine the ecosystems' resilience to such adverse conditions. The ecosystem water use efficiency (WUE : NPP/Evapotranspiration) is an effective indicator of ecosystem productivity, linking carbon (C) and water cycles. We found a significant difference (p < .05) in WUE across India at different scales. The ecosystem resilience analysis indicated that most of the river basins were not resilient enough to hydroclimatic disturbances. Drastic reduction in WUE under dry conditions was observed for some basins, which highlighted the cross-biome incapability to withstand such conditions. The ecosystem resilience at land cover and climate type scale did not completely relate to the basin-scale ecosystem resilience, which indicated that ecosystem resilience at basin scale is controlled by some other ecohydrological processes. Our results facilitate the identification of the most sensitive regions in the country for ecosystem management and climate policy making, and highlight the need for taking sufficient adaptation measures to ensure sustainability of ecosystems.

摘要

最近的研究表明,干旱等水文气候干扰呈上升趋势,预计在全球变暖与气候变化的背景下,此类干扰将更加频繁和剧烈。干旱会对植被生长和作物产量产生不利影响,从而加剧了印度这样一个拥有超过 12 亿人口的国家的粮食安全风险。在这里,我们比较了印度不同尺度(即河流流域、土地覆盖和气候类型)陆地净初级生产力(NPP)对水文气候干扰的响应,以检验生态系统对这些不利条件的恢复力。生态系统水分利用效率(WUE:NPP/蒸散量)是连接碳(C)和水循环的生态系统生产力的有效指标。我们发现,不同尺度的印度 WUE 存在显著差异(p<0.05)。生态系统恢复力分析表明,大多数流域对水文气候干扰的恢复力不足。一些流域在干旱条件下 WUE 急剧下降,这突出表明了跨生物群落无法承受这种情况。土地覆盖和气候类型尺度的生态系统恢复力与流域尺度的生态系统恢复力不完全相关,这表明流域尺度的生态系统恢复力受到其他一些生态水文学过程的控制。我们的研究结果有助于确定该国对生态系统管理和气候政策制定最敏感的区域,并强调需要采取充分的适应措施以确保生态系统的可持续性。

相似文献

1
Assessment of ecosystem resilience to hydroclimatic disturbances in India.评估印度水气候干扰对生态系统弹性的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Feb;24(2):e432-e441. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13874. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
2
Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions.尽管受到大规模水文气候条件改变的影响,生态系统仍具有弹性。
Nature. 2013 Feb 21;494(7437):349-52. doi: 10.1038/nature11836. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
3
Assessment of Risk and Resilience of Terrestrial Ecosystem Productivity under the Influence of Extreme Climatic Conditions over India.评估印度极端气候条件下陆地生态系统生产力的风险和恢复力。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 12;9(1):18923. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55067-0.
4
Assessment of water and carbon use efficiency in the SAARC region for ecological resilience under changing climate.评估变化气候下 SAARC 地区的水和碳使用效率,以实现生态弹性。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 15;326(Pt B):116812. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116812. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
5
Multi-scale assessment of eco-hydrological resilience to drought in China over the last three decades.过去三十年中国生态水文干旱恢复力的多尺度评估
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jul 1;672:201-211. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.408. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
High ecosystem stability of evergreen broadleaf forests under severe droughts.常绿阔叶林在严重干旱下具有较高的生态系统稳定性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Oct;25(10):3494-3503. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14748. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
7
Water use efficiency of China's terrestrial ecosystems and responses to drought.中国陆地生态系统的水分利用效率及其对干旱的响应。
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 8;5:13799. doi: 10.1038/srep13799.
8
Climatic drought impacts on key ecosystem services of a low mountain region in Germany.气候干旱对德国低山地区关键生态系统服务的影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jun 2;195(7):800. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11397-1.
9
[Change of vegetation net primary productivity in Yellow River watersheds from 2001 to 2010 and its climatic driving factors analysis].2001—2010年黄河流域植被净初级生产力变化及其气候驱动因素分析
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2014 Oct;25(10):2811-8.
10
Global variations in ecosystem-scale isohydricity.全球生态系统尺度等水力特征的变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Feb;23(2):891-905. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13389. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatiotemporal dynamic of subtropical forest carbon storage and its resistance and resilience to drought in China.中国亚热带森林碳储量的时空动态及其对干旱的抗性和恢复力
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jan 17;14:1067552. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1067552. eCollection 2023.
2
Meteorological Drought Variability and Its Impact on Wheat Yields across South Africa.气象干旱变化及其对南非小麦产量的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;19(24):16469. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416469.
3
Analysing frequent extreme flood incidences in Brahmaputra basin, South Asia.
分析南亚布拉马普特拉河流域频繁发生的极端洪灾事件。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 22;17(8):e0273384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273384. eCollection 2022.
4
Reviewing the Use of Resilience Concepts in Forest Sciences.森林科学中恢复力概念的应用综述
Curr For Rep. 2020 Jun 1;6:61-80. doi: 10.1007/s40725-020-00110-x. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
5
Dramatic increase in water use efficiency with cumulative forest disturbance at the large forested watershed scale.在大型森林流域尺度上,随着森林累积干扰,水分利用效率急剧提高。
Carbon Balance Manag. 2021 Mar 1;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13021-021-00169-4.
6
Assessment of Risk and Resilience of Terrestrial Ecosystem Productivity under the Influence of Extreme Climatic Conditions over India.评估印度极端气候条件下陆地生态系统生产力的风险和恢复力。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 12;9(1):18923. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55067-0.