Sjöberg Lis, Lindner Helen, Hermansson Liselotte
1 Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
2 Department of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Oct;42(5):527-533. doi: 10.1177/0309364617729922. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
Different recommendations exist regarding what age is best for first-time fitting of myoelectric hand prostheses in children.
To compare prosthetic skill, prosthetic use and risk for rejection over time between children fitted with myoelectric hand prostheses before or after 2½ years of age.
Prospective case-control design.
The cases were nine children fitted with myoelectric hand prostheses before the age of 2½ years, whereas the controls were 27 children who were fitted with myoelectric hand prostheses after the age of 2½ years. The Skills Index Ranking Scale was used to classify prosthetic skill, and prosthetic use was categorised based on wearing time and pattern. Independent samples tests were used to compare data between groups. To estimate and compare the risk of prosthesis rejection between groups and over time, survival analysis was used.
Cases showed prosthetic skill early, but controls had caught up by the age of 3½ years. Cases had a significant ( p = 0.046) decrease in prosthetic use at the age of 9 years. In the long term, cases had a higher percentage of prosthesis rejection.
Considering young children's development of prosthetic skill and prosthetic use over time, this study shows no additional advantages from fitting a myoelectric hand prosthesis before 2½ years of age. Clinical relevance Children may be fitted with myoelectric hand prostheses to assist in daily tasks and to prevent future over-use problems. Most children fitted with myoelectric hand prostheses before 4 years of age become regular users. No advantages of fitting myoelectric hand prostheses before 2½ years of age were observed.
关于儿童首次安装肌电假手的最佳年龄,存在不同的建议。
比较2.5岁之前或之后安装肌电假手的儿童在不同时间的假肢技能、假肢使用情况和排斥风险。
前瞻性病例对照设计。
病例组为9名在2.5岁之前安装肌电假手的儿童,对照组为27名在2.5岁之后安装肌电假手的儿童。使用技能指数排名量表对假肢技能进行分类,并根据佩戴时间和模式对假肢使用情况进行分类。采用独立样本检验比较组间数据。为了估计和比较组间以及不同时间的假体排斥风险,使用了生存分析。
病例组早期显示出假肢技能,但对照组在3.5岁时已赶上。病例组在9岁时假肢使用情况显著下降(p = 0.046)。从长期来看,病例组的假体排斥百分比更高。
考虑到幼儿假肢技能和假肢使用情况随时间的发展,本研究表明在2.5岁之前安装肌电假手没有额外优势。临床意义 可为儿童安装肌电假手以协助日常任务并预防未来的过度使用问题。大多数在4岁之前安装肌电假手的儿童成为常规使用者。未观察到在2.5岁之前安装肌电假手的优势。