Suppr超能文献

“以目标为导向教学”以更好地评估被监禁的临床研究参与者对知情同意的理解

"Teach-to-Goal" to Better Assess Informed Consent Comprehension among Incarcerated Clinical Research Participants.

作者信息

Ahalt Cyrus, Sudore Rebecca, Bolano Marielle, Metzger Lia, Darby Anna M, Williams Brie

机构信息

A researcher and policy analyst in the Department of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco.

A professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, where she serves as a geriatrician, palliative medicine physician, and clinician investigator.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2017 Sep 1;19(9):862-872. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.9.peer3-1709.

Abstract

Correctional health research requires important safeguards to ensure that research participation is ethically conducted. In addition to having disproportionately low educational attainment and low literacy, incarcerated people suffer from health-related conditions that can affect cognition (e.g., traumatic brain injury, substance use disorders, mental illness). Yet modified informed consent processes that assess participants' comprehension of the risks and benefits of participation are not required by relevant federal guidelines. A push to assess comprehension of informed consent documents is particularly timely given an increase in demand for correctional health research in the context of criminal justice reform. We argue that comprehension assessments can identify persons who should be excluded from research and help those who will ultimately participate in studies better understand the risks and benefits of their participation.

摘要

惩教健康研究需要重要的保障措施,以确保研究参与在伦理上得以进行。除了教育程度和识字率极低之外,被监禁者还患有可能影响认知的健康相关疾病(例如创伤性脑损伤、物质使用障碍、精神疾病)。然而,相关联邦指南并未要求采用经过修改的知情同意程序来评估参与者对参与研究的风险和益处的理解。鉴于刑事司法改革背景下对惩教健康研究的需求增加,推动对知情同意文件理解情况的评估尤为及时。我们认为,理解情况评估可以识别出应被排除在研究之外的人员,并帮助那些最终将参与研究的人更好地理解参与研究的风险和益处。

相似文献

1
"Teach-to-Goal" to Better Assess Informed Consent Comprehension among Incarcerated Clinical Research Participants.
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Sep 1;19(9):862-872. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.9.peer3-1709.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
6
A strategy for learning principles and elements of informed consent.
Nurse Educ. 2008 Mar-Apr;33(2):75-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000299507.47776.6a.
8
Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Feb;11(1):31-46. doi: 10.1177/1556264616637483.
9
The big Cs of the informed consent form: compliance and comprehension.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2013 Oct-Dec;10(4):232-7. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2013.071.
10

引用本文的文献

2
"It's just us sitting there for 23 hours like we done something wrong": Isolation, incarceration, and the COVID-19 pandemic.
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 14;19(2):e0297518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297518. eCollection 2024.
4
Refusal to participate in research among hard-to-reach populations: The case of detained persons.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 3;18(3):e0282083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282083. eCollection 2023.
9
Cognition and Incarceration: Cognitive Impairment and Its Associated Outcomes in Older Adults in Jail.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Nov;66(11):2065-2071. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15521. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
10
The Health of America's Aging Prison Population.
Epidemiol Rev. 2018 Jun 1;40(1):157-165. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxx020.

本文引用的文献

1
Enrolling in Clinical Research While Incarcerated: What Influences Participants' Decisions?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2017 Mar;47(2):21-29. doi: 10.1002/hast.686.
2
Detained and Distressed: Persistent Distressing Symptoms in a Population of Older Jail Inmates.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):2349-2355. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14310. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
3
A Call to Action: A Blueprint for Academic Health Sciences in the Era of Mass Incarceration.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(2A):5-17. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0051.
6
Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK.
J Med Ethics. 2016 Apr;42(4):246-52. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101059. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
7
Incarceration, community health, and racial disparities.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013 Feb;24(1):78-88. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0000.
8
Improving the informed consent process for research subjects with low literacy: a systematic review.
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):121-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2133-2. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
9
Forget me not: dementia in prison.
Gerontologist. 2012 Aug;52(4):441-51. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr131. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
10
Collective action to end health disparities.
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S16-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300372. Epub 2011 Oct 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验