Hastings Cent Rep. 2017 Mar;47(2):21-29. doi: 10.1002/hast.686.
As a 2006 Institute of Medicine report highlights, surprisingly little empirical attention has been paid to how prisoners arrive at decisions to participate in modern research. With our study, we aimed to fill this gap by identifying a more comprehensive range of factors as reported by prisoners themselves during semistructured interviews. Our participants described a diverse range of motives, both favoring and opposing their eventual decision to join. Many are well-recognized considerations among nonincarcerated clinical research participants, including a desire for various forms of personal benefit, altruism, and concern about study risks and inconveniences. However, a number of influences seem unique to prisoners. Participants did not report that they were not coerced into enrolling, and they have even been under pressure not to enroll. However, many sought to enroll in order to obtain access to better health care, raising a concern about whether they were unfairly exploited.
2006 年美国医学研究所的一份报告强调,令人惊讶的是,很少有实证研究关注囚犯是如何做出参与现代研究的决定的。在我们的研究中,我们旨在通过在半结构化访谈中识别囚犯自己报告的更全面的一系列因素来填补这一空白。我们的参与者描述了各种各样的动机,既有支持也有反对他们最终决定加入的动机。其中许多都是非监禁临床研究参与者所熟知的考虑因素,包括对各种形式的个人利益、利他主义的渴望,以及对研究风险和不便的关注。然而,一些影响似乎是囚犯所特有的。参与者没有报告说他们是被迫参加的,甚至有人施压不让他们参加。然而,许多人希望参加研究是为了获得更好的医疗保健,这引发了人们的担忧,即他们是否受到了不公平的利用。