Wang Fen, Chang Cai, Chen Min, Gao Yi, Chen Ya-Ling, Zhou Shi-Chong, Li Jia-Wei, Zhi Wen-Xiang
Departments of Ultrasonography and Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
J Ultrasound Med. 2018 Mar;37(3):601-609. doi: 10.1002/jum.14367. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography (SWE) combined with conventional ultrasonography (US) for differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid nodules of different sizes.
A total of 445 thyroid nodules from 445 patients were divided into 3 groups based on diameter (group 1, ≤ 10 mm; group 2, 10-20 mm; and group 3, > 20 mm). The mean elasticity index of the whole lesion was automatically calculated, and the threshold for differentiation between benign and malignant nodules was constructed by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Diagnostic performances of conventional US and SWE were compared by using pathologic results as reference standards.
The mean elasticity was significantly higher in malignant versus benign nodules for all size groups. The differences in mean elasticity in the size groups were not statistically significant for malignant or benign nodules. The specificity of US combined with SWE for group 1 was significantly higher than that for groups 2 and 3 (77.8% versus 62.9% and 53.3%; P < .05), and compared with group 1, the sensitivity was significantly higher for groups 2 and 3 (92.4% and 94.3% versus 80.7%; P < .05). When SWE was added, the specificity increased and the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy decreased for group 1, and the sensitivity increased and the specificity decreased for groups 2 and 3; however, the differences were not significant.
Combined with SWE, US yielded higher specificity for nodules of 10 mm and smaller and higher sensitivity for nodules larger than 10 mm.
我们旨在研究剪切波弹性成像(SWE)联合传统超声(US)对不同大小的甲状腺良恶性结节进行鉴别的诊断性能。
将445例患者的445个甲状腺结节根据直径分为3组(1组,直径≤10mm;2组,直径10 - 20mm;3组,直径>20mm)。自动计算整个病灶的平均弹性指数,并通过受试者工作特征曲线分析构建良恶性结节的鉴别阈值。以病理结果作为参考标准,比较传统超声和SWE的诊断性能。
所有大小组中,恶性结节的平均弹性均显著高于良性结节。对于恶性或良性结节,各大小组的平均弹性差异无统计学意义。1组中US联合SWE的特异性显著高于2组和3组(77.8%对62.9%和53.3%;P<0.05),与1组相比,2组和3组的敏感性显著更高(92.4%和94.3%对80.7%;P<0.05)。添加SWE后,1组的特异性增加,敏感性和诊断准确性降低,2组和3组的敏感性增加,特异性降低;然而,差异无统计学意义。
US联合SWE对10mm及以下的结节具有更高的特异性,对大于10mm的结节具有更高的敏感性。