Stoutland Alicia, Long Ross E, Mercado Ana, Daskalogiannakis John, Hathaway Ronald R, Russell Kathleen A, Singer Emily, Semb Gunvor, Shaw William C
*Lancaster Cleft Palate Clinic, Lancaster, PA †Ohio State University, Columbus, OH ‡Sick Kids Hospital, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada §Peyton Manning Children's Hospital at St. Vincent, Indianapolis, IN ||Dalhousie University/IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS ¶Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA #University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada **University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Nov;28(8):1911-1917. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003787.
The purpose of this study was to investigate ways to improve rater reliability and satisfaction in nasolabial esthetic evaluations of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), by modifying the Asher-McDade method with use of Q-sort methodology. Blinded ratings of cropped photographs of one hundred forty-nine 5- to 7-year-old consecutively treated patients with complete UCLP from 4 different centers were used in a rating of frontal and profile nasolabial esthetic outcomes by 6 judges involved in the Americleft Project's intercenter outcome comparisons. Four judges rated in previous studies using the original Asher-McDade approach. For the Q-sort modification, rather than projection of images, each judge had cards with frontal and profile photographs of each patient and rated them on a scale of 1 to 5 for vermillion border, nasolabial frontal, and profile, using the Q-sort method with placement of cards into categories 1 to 5. Inter- and intrarater reliabilities were calculated using the Weighted Kappa (95% confidence interval). For 4 raters, the reliabilities were compared with those in previous studies. There was no significant improvement in inter-rater reliabilities using the new method. Intrarater reliability consistently improved. All raters preferred the Q-sort method with rating cards rather than a PowerPoint of photos, which improved internal consistency in rating compared to previous studies using the original Asher-McDade method. All raters preferred this method because of the ability to continuously compare photos and adjust relative ratings between patients.
本研究的目的是通过运用Q分类法对阿舍-麦克戴德方法进行改进,探讨提高单侧完全性唇腭裂(UCLP)患者鼻唇美学评估中评分者信度和满意度的方法。来自4个不同中心的149名年龄在5至7岁、接受连续治疗的UCLP患者的裁剪照片,由参与美国腭裂项目中心间结果比较的6名评判者对其正面和侧面鼻唇美学结果进行盲法评分。4名评判者在之前的研究中采用了原始的阿舍-麦克戴德方法。对于Q分类法的改进,评判者不是观看图像投影,而是有每位患者正面和侧面照片的卡片,并使用Q分类法,将卡片按1至5级分类,对每位患者的红唇缘、鼻唇正面和侧面按1至5分进行评分。使用加权卡帕(95%置信区间)计算评分者间和评分者内信度。对于4名评分者,将信度与之前研究中的信度进行比较。使用新方法在评分者间信度方面没有显著提高。评分者内信度持续提高。所有评分者都更喜欢使用评分卡的Q分类法,而不是照片的PowerPoint展示,与之前使用原始阿舍-麦克戴德方法的研究相比,这提高了评分的内部一致性。所有评分者都更喜欢这种方法,因为能够持续比较照片并调整患者之间的相对评分。