• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国腭裂项目:一项针对5至7岁完全性单侧唇腭裂(CUCLP)患者的拟议扩大鼻唇外观衡量标准。

The Americleft Project: A Proposed Expanded Nasolabial Appearance Yardstick for 5- to 7-Year-Old Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (CUCLP).

作者信息

Mercado A M, Russell K A, Daskalogiannakis J, Hathaway R R, Semb G, Ozawa T, Smith A, Lin A Y, Long R E

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016 Jan;53(1):30-7. doi: 10.1597/14-017. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1597/14-017
PMID:25844562
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a yardstick of reference photographs for nasolabial appearance assessments of 5- to 7-year-old patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP).

DESIGN

Blind retrospective analysis of clinical records and comparison to historical controls.

PATIENTS

Subjects were two groups of 6- to 12-year-olds (n = 124 and n = 135) and one group of 5- to 7-year-olds (n = 149) with nonsyndromic CUCLP from three previous Americleft studies, including cohorts from seven different cleft/craniofacial centers.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received the infant management protocols of their respective centers. Eleven trained and calibrated judges (five participated in all three studies) did blind ratings of nasolabial appearance using the Asher-McDade method.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients receiving the most consistent ratings between judges, selected first from the groups of 6- to 12-year-olds, were used to create a pilot yardstick for eventual use in the third study of 5- to 7-year-olds. For each of the Asher-McDade categories, 8 of the 5- to 7-year-old patients receiving the most consistent scores between raters were ranked by 10 judges for a final elimination to leave three per category.

RESULTS

Using this method of successive changes in rating methods, a new reference yardstick for nasolabial appearance rating was established and linked to the original Asher-McDade method as well as the single examples in a previously published yardstick for patients with CUCLP. Pilot testing using the yardstick improved reliabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of an expanded nasolabial yardstick of reference photographs representative of the range of possibilities of each of the five Asher-McDade categories is now available to see if reliability of these ratings can be improved.

摘要

目的

制定一套用于5至7岁完全性单侧唇腭裂(CUCLP)患者鼻唇外观评估的参考照片标准。

设计

对临床记录进行盲法回顾性分析,并与历史对照进行比较。

患者

受试者为来自之前三项美国腭裂研究的两组6至12岁儿童(n = 124和n = 135)以及一组5至7岁儿童(n = 149),患有非综合征性CUCLP,包括来自七个不同腭裂/颅面中心的队列。

干预措施

所有患者均接受各自中心的婴儿管理方案。11名经过培训和校准的评判员(其中5名参与了所有三项研究)使用阿舍 - 麦克戴德方法对鼻唇外观进行盲法评分。

主要观察指标

首先从6至12岁组中选出评判员之间评分最一致的患者,用于创建一个试点标准,最终用于5至7岁儿童的第三项研究。对于阿舍 - 麦克戴德分类中的每一类,由10名评判员对评分最一致的5至7岁患者中的8名进行排名,最终每类淘汰至3名。

结果

采用这种评分方法的连续变化方式,建立了一种新的鼻唇外观评分参考标准,并将其与原始的阿舍 - 麦克戴德方法以及之前发表的CUCLP患者标准中的单个示例相联系。使用该标准进行的试点测试提高了可靠性。

结论

现在可以使用一套扩展的鼻唇参考照片标准,该标准代表了阿舍 - 麦克戴德五类中每一类可能性的范围,以检验这些评分的可靠性是否能够提高。

相似文献

1
The Americleft Project: A Proposed Expanded Nasolabial Appearance Yardstick for 5- to 7-Year-Old Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (CUCLP).美国腭裂项目:一项针对5至7岁完全性单侧唇腭裂(CUCLP)患者的拟议扩大鼻唇外观衡量标准。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016 Jan;53(1):30-7. doi: 10.1597/14-017. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
2
The Americleft Project: A Modification of Asher-McDade Method for Rating Nasolabial Esthetics in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using Q-sort.美国腭裂项目:一种对阿舍-麦克戴德法的改良,用于通过Q分类法评估单侧唇腭裂患者的鼻唇美学。
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Nov;28(8):1911-1917. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003787.
3
Reliability of Americleft Yardstick Nasolabial Appearance Assessment With/Without Basal View for Japanese Children With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate.美国腭裂评估量表对日本单侧完全性唇腭裂患儿鼻唇外观评估的可靠性:有无基底视图对比
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Aug;56(7):953-959. doi: 10.1177/1055665618818679. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
4
The Americleft Project: Comparison of Ratings Using Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Images for Evaluation of Nasolabial Appearance in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.美国腭裂项目:二维与三维图像用于评估单侧唇腭裂患者鼻唇外观的评分比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jan;29(1):105-108. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004102.
5
Burden of Care of Various Infant Orthopedic Protocols for Improvement of Nasolabial Esthetics in Patients With CUCLP.用于改善唇腭裂患者鼻唇美学的各种婴儿骨科治疗方案的护理负担
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Oct;55(9):1236-1243. doi: 10.1177/1055665618766978. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Nasolabial aesthetics correlates poorly with skeletal symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate.单侧唇裂腭裂患者的鼻唇美学与骨骼对称性相关性差。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Jan;66(1):e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.08.032. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
7
The Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index in Comparison With Two Scoring Systems in Nonsyndromic Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.非综合征性完全性单侧唇腭裂患者中阿舍-麦克戴德美学指数与两种评分系统的比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1242-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001784.
8
The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 4. Nasolabial aesthetics.美国腭裂研究:一项关于单侧唇腭裂患者治疗效果的多中心研究 第4部分。鼻唇美学。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 May;48(3):259-64. doi: 10.1597/09-186.1. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
9
Nasolabial symmetry and aesthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.单侧完全性唇腭裂患儿的鼻唇对称性与美学
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Oct;50(7):621-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.11.019. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
10
An Intercenter Comparison of Nasolabial Appearance Including a Center Using Nasoalveolar Molding.包括使用鼻牙槽塑形术的中心在内的鼻唇外观的多中心比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 May;55(5):655-663. doi: 10.1177/1055665618754947. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A Longitudinal Investigation of Nasolabial Changes With and Without Revision Surgery in Patients with Non-Syndromic Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.非综合征性单侧唇腭裂患者行与不行修复手术时鼻唇变化的纵向研究
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Aug;62(8):1376-1384. doi: 10.1177/10556656241256706. Epub 2024 May 30.
2
Defining the Aesthetic Range of Normal Symmetry for Lip and Nose Features in 5-Year-Old Children Using the Computer-Based Program SymNose.使用基于计算机的程序SymNose定义5岁儿童嘴唇和鼻子特征的正常对称美学范围。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Jul;56(6):799-805. doi: 10.1177/1055665618813236. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
3
Active Presurgical Infant Orthopedics for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Intercenter Outcome Comparison of Latham, Modified McNeil, and Nasoalveolar Molding.
单侧唇腭裂的术前主动婴儿矫形术:Latham法、改良McNeil法和鼻牙槽塑形术的多中心疗效比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 May;55(5):639-648. doi: 10.1177/1055665618757367. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
4
Facial Aesthetics in Young Adults after Cleft Lip and Palate Treatment over Five Decades.唇腭裂患者治疗后 50 余年的青年面容美学
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 20;7(1):15864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16249-w.
5
The Americleft Project: Burden of Care from Secondary Surgery.美国腭裂项目:二次手术的护理负担
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Aug 10;3(7):e442. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000415. eCollection 2015 Jul.