Huang Hung-Sheng, Hsu Chien-Chin, Ye Je-Chiuan, Su Shih-Bin, Huang Chien-Cheng, Lin Hung-Jung
Department of Emergency Medicine Department of Occupational Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center Department of Biotechnology, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology Bachelor Program of Senior Service Department of Leisure, Recreation, and Tourism Management, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology Department of Medical Research, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Liouying Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Chi-Mei Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(37):e7878. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007878.
Geriatric patients have high mortality for dengue fever (DF); however, there is no adequate method to predict mortality in geriatric patients. Therefore, we conducted this study to develop a tool in an attempt to address this issue.We conducted a retrospective case-control study in a tertiary medical center during the DF outbreak in Taiwan in 2015. All the geriatric patients (aged ≥65 years) who visited the study hospital between September 1, 2015, and December 31, 2015, were recruited into this study. Variables included demographic data, vital signs, symptoms and signs, comorbidities, living status, laboratory data, and 30-day mortality. We investigated independent mortality predictors by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis and then combined these predictors to predict the mortality.A total of 627 geriatric DF patients were recruited, with a mortality rate of 4.3% (27 deaths and 600 survivals). The following 4 independent mortality predictors were identified: severe coma [Glasgow Coma Scale: ≤8; adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 11.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89-68.19], bedridden (AOR: 10.46; 95% CI: 1.58-69.16), severe hepatitis (aspartate aminotransferase >1000 U/L; AOR: 96.08; 95% CI: 14.11-654.40), and renal failure (serum creatinine >2 mg/dL; AOR: 6.03; 95% CI: 1.50-24.24). When we combined the predictors, we found that the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for patients with 1 or more predictors were 70.37%, 88.17%, 21.11%, and 98.51%, respectively. For patients with 2 or more predictors, the respective values were 33.33%, 99.44%, 57.14%, and 98.51%.We developed a new method to help decision making. Among geriatric patients with none of the predictors, the survival rate was 98.51%, and among those with 2 or more predictors, the mortality rate was 57.14%. This method is simple and useful, especially in an outbreak.
老年登革热(DF)患者死亡率较高;然而,目前尚无足够方法预测老年患者的死亡率。因此,我们开展了这项研究以开发一种工具来解决这一问题。我们于2015年台湾登革热疫情期间在一家三级医疗中心进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究。纳入了2015年9月1日至2015年12月31日期间到本研究医院就诊的所有老年患者(年龄≥65岁)。变量包括人口统计学数据、生命体征、症状和体征、合并症、生活状况、实验室数据以及30天死亡率。我们通过单因素分析和多因素逻辑回归分析调查独立的死亡预测因素,然后将这些预测因素结合起来预测死亡率。共招募了627例老年登革热患者,死亡率为4.3%(27例死亡,600例存活)。确定了以下4个独立的死亡预测因素:重度昏迷[格拉斯哥昏迷量表:≤8;调整后比值比(AOR):11.36;95%置信区间(CI):1.89 - 68.19]、卧床不起(AOR:10.46;95%CI:1.58 - 69.16)、重度肝炎(天冬氨酸转氨酶>1000 U/L;AOR:96.08;95%CI:14.11 - 654.40)和肾衰竭(血清肌酐>2 mg/dL;AOR:6.03;95%CI:1.50 - 24.24)。当我们将这些预测因素结合起来时,发现有1个或更多预测因素的患者的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为70.37%、88.17%、21.11%和98.51%。对于有2个或更多预测因素的患者,相应的值分别为33.33%、99.44%、57.14%和98.51%。我们开发了一种有助于决策的新方法。在无任何预测因素的老年患者中,存活率为98.51%,而在有2个或更多预测因素的患者中,死亡率为57.14%。这种方法简单且有用,尤其是在疫情期间。