Bouyoucef Salah E, Mercuri Mathew, Pascual Thomas N, Allam Adel H, Vangu Mboyo, Vitola João V, Better Nathan, Karthikeyan Ganesan, Mahmarian John J, Rehani Madan M, Kashyap Ravi, Dondi Maurizio, Paez Diana, Einstein Andrew J
Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bab El Ouéd, Alger, Algeria.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, USA.
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2017 Jul/Aug;28(4):229-234. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2016-091.
While nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) offers many benefits to patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease, concerns exist regarding radiation-associated health effects. Little is known regarding MPI practice in Africa. We sought to characterise radiation doses and the use of MPI best practices that could minimise radiation in African nuclear cardiology laboratories, and compare these to practice worldwide.
Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected for a consecutive sample of 348 patients from 12 laboratories in six African countries over a one-week period from March to April 2013. Radiation effective dose (ED) was estimated for each patient. A quality index (QI) enumerating adherence to eight best practices, identified a priori by an IAEA expert panel, was calculated for each laboratory. We compared these metrics with those from 7 563 patients from 296 laboratories outside Africa.
Median (interquartile range) patient ED in Africa was similar to that of the rest of the world [9.1 (5.1-15.6) vs 10.3 mSv (6.8-12.6), p = 0.14], although a larger proportion of African patients received a low ED, ≤ 9 mSv targeted in societal recommendations (49.7 vs 38.2%, p < 0.001). Bestpractice adherence was higher among African laboratories (QI score: 6.3 ± 1.2 vs 5.4 ± 1.3, p = 0.013). However, median ED varied significantly among African laboratories (range: 2.0-16.3 mSv; p < 0.0001) and QI range was 4-8.
Patient radiation dose from MPI in Africa was similar to that in the rest of the world, and adherence to best practices was relatively high in African laboratories. Nevertheless there remain opportunities to further reduce radiation exposure to African patients from MPI.
虽然核素心肌灌注显像(MPI)为已知或疑似心血管疾病患者带来诸多益处,但人们仍担心其辐射对健康的影响。目前对非洲地区MPI的应用情况知之甚少。我们试图描述非洲核心脏病学实验室的辐射剂量及可将辐射降至最低的MPI最佳实践的应用情况,并将其与全球的实践情况进行比较。
2013年3月至4月的一周内,连续收集了来自非洲6个国家12个实验室的348例患者的人口统计学和临床特征数据。估算了每位患者的辐射有效剂量(ED)。为每个实验室计算了一个质量指数(QI),该指数列举了国际原子能机构专家小组预先确定的八项最佳实践的遵守情况。我们将这些指标与来自非洲以外296个实验室的7563例患者的指标进行了比较。
非洲患者的中位(四分位间距)ED与世界其他地区相似[9.1(5.1 - 15.6)对10.3 mSv(6.8 - 12.6),p = 0.14],不过接受低ED(≤9 mSv,这是社会建议的目标剂量)的非洲患者比例更高(49.7%对38.2%,p < 0.001)。非洲实验室对最佳实践的遵守情况更高(QI评分:6.3±1.2对5.4±1.3,p = 0.013)。然而,非洲各实验室之间的中位ED差异显著(范围:2.0 - 16.3 mSv;p < 0.0001),QI范围为4 - 8。
非洲地区MPI对患者的辐射剂量与世界其他地区相似,非洲实验室对最佳实践的遵守情况相对较高。尽管如此,仍有机会进一步降低非洲患者因MPI而受到的辐射暴露。