Farmer Julie, Phillips Rebecca C, Singhal Sonica, Quiñonez Carlos
Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, 124 Edwards Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 1G6, Canada.
Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Can J Public Health. 2017 Sep 14;108(3):e240-e245. doi: 10.17269/CJPH.108.5929.
To quantify the extent to which income and education explain gradients in oral health outcomes.
Using data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS 2003), binary logistic regression models were constructed to examine the relationship between income and education on self-reported oral health (SROH) and chewing difficulties (CD) while controlling for age, sex, ethnicity, employment status and dental insurance coverage. The relative index of inequality (RII) was utilized to quantify the extent to which income and education explain gradients in poor SROH and CD.
Income and education gradients were present for SROH and CD. From fully adjusted models, income inequalities were greater for CD (RIIinc = 2.85) than for SROH (RIIinc = 2.75), with no substantial difference in education inequalities between the two. Income explained 37.4% and 42.4% of the education gradient in SROH and CD respectively, whereas education explained 45.2% and 6.1% of income gradients in SROH and CD respectively. Education appears to play a larger role than income when explaining inequalities in SROH; however, it is the opposite for CD.
In this sample of the Canadian adult population, income explained over one third of the education gradient in SROH and CDs, whereas the contribution of education to income gradients varied by choice of self-reported outcome. Results call for stakeholders to improve affordability of dental care in order to reduce inequalities in the Canadian population.
量化收入和教育对口腔健康结果梯度的解释程度。
利用加拿大社区健康调查(2003年加拿大社区健康调查)的数据,构建二元逻辑回归模型,在控制年龄、性别、种族、就业状况和牙科保险覆盖范围的同时,研究收入和教育与自我报告的口腔健康(SROH)和咀嚼困难(CD)之间的关系。利用不平等相对指数(RII)来量化收入和教育对不良SROH和CD梯度的解释程度。
SROH和CD存在收入和教育梯度。从完全调整模型来看,CD的收入不平等(RIIinc = 2.85)大于SROH的收入不平等(RIIinc = 2.75),两者的教育不平等没有实质性差异。收入分别解释了SROH和CD中教育梯度的37.4%和42.4%,而教育分别解释了SROH和CD中收入梯度的45.2%和6.1%。在解释SROH不平等时,教育似乎比收入发挥更大的作用;然而,对于CD来说则相反。
在这个加拿大成年人口样本中,收入解释了SROH和CD中超过三分之一的教育梯度,而教育对收入梯度的贡献因自我报告结果的选择而异。结果呼吁利益相关者提高牙科护理的可承受性,以减少加拿大人口中的不平等现象。